Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
By Joseph A. Lopisi
08 February, 2008
It is hard to pick a place to start in terms of talking about the most
outrageous lies that the
Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission have presented to the people
in this country as a
reason to attack Afghanistan and Iraq and to launch a "fake war on
terror".
The reason I say this is that I have been reading articles and watching
videos about the lies
and deceptions surrounding 9/11 for the past three years. If anything,
there are so many
obvious unanswered questions about 9/11. However, not only has no one
answered any of these
questions but in fact no one in the mainstream media nor anyone in the
United States Congress
except for Representative Kucinich and Cynthia McKinney have even asked
these questions.
Some of these questions are:
1. How is it that at the crash site of Flight 93, NBC and Fox News on
September 11, 2001
re****ted on the scene with video coverage that there was no sign of a
jetliner, engines, bodies
or luggage? You can go to my website which is www.911insidejob.net and
watch this video re****t
which is on my home page. It has never been shown again on the mainstream
media.
2. How is it that three steel framed buildings on September 11, 2001 fell
in freefall time on
their footprint? If you watch the two Towers collapse, it is obvious that
they are being blown
up. No steel framed building prior to this date or after this date has
ever collapsed due to
fire. Many steel framed buildings have experienced burning infernos for
many hours and never
collapsed. WTC 7, a 50 story steel framed building, had two small fires in
it with no
noticeable structural damage when it collapsed on his footprint in
freefall time at about 5:40
p.m. on September 11. You can watch this building collapse on the homepage
my website.
3. How is it that the most protected building in the world, the Pentagon,
was hit by a
commercial jetliner that was being tracked by Vice President Cheney in the
basement of the
White House for over one hour? Trans****tation Secretary Mineta testified
under oath that he
witnessed a member of the United States military ask Vice President Cheney
several times
whether the order still stood relative to not shooting down the oncoming
plane. Vice President
Cheney's answer was that the order still stands. You can watch Secretary
Mineta's testimony on
the home page of my website. The Pentagon is protected by a battery of
antiaircraft guns that
would automatically shoot down any plane that does not have a United
States military
transponder on it.
4. How is it that only five frames have been presented by this government
to show supposedly
what hit the Pentagon on that date. The Pentagon has surveillance cameras
ringing the top
exterior ring of the building. The FBI within 10 minutes of the attack
were confiscating
surveillance films from local businesses around the Pentagon. None of
these confiscated
surveillance films have been released. I would bet that a satellite sits
above Wa****ngton, DC
24 hours every day and would have very good video images showing what hit
the Pentagon.
5. How is it that a large commercial jetliner was able to crash into the
first floor of the
Pentagon and punch a round hole through three rings of the Pentagon which
is constructed of
steel reinforced concrete? The nose of a commercial jetliner is made of
aluminum.
6. Why is it that Jamie McIntyre of CNN re****ted on the front lawn of the
Pentagon on September
11 that from his vantage point it did not look like a commercial jetliner
had crashed into the
Pentagon? Why is it that this re****t has never been shown on mainstream
media but can be seen
on my website? Why is it that we have not heard another word from Jamie
McIntyre or CNN
regarding this re****t?
7. How was it that four commercial airliners were able to roam at will the
northeastern sector
of the United States without being intercepted? Of course, Flight 93 was
intercepted and shot
down by the US military. The northeastern sector of the United States is
the most protected
airspace in the world. There are several Air Force bases very close to
Wa****ngton, DC and no
jets from these Air Force bases came close to intercepting the plane that
hit the Pentagon,
despite the fact that Vice President Cheney knew the plane was heading
towards Wa****ngton, DC
for almost an hour.
I could go on and on but I will leave that to those who consider the truth
about what happened
on 9/11 to be im****tant. You can go to my website or many other 9/11
websites and start reading
about how outrageous the official 9/11 story is. You can go to
www.youtube.com and watch five
videos that I have produced under my call name which is "bushguiltyof911".
Vice President Cheney met with the heads of the various oil companies
right after Bush took
office. When the public wanted to know who was there and what they were
talking about, Vice
President Cheney fought this request to the United States Supreme Court
(the same court that
elected George Bush in 2000) where he won. They were talking about
attacking Iraq in order to
gain control of their oil fields. They were talking about attacking
Afghanistan to take over
the construction of a gas pipeline through Afghanistan. The Taliban, prior
to September 11,
2001, had already said no to the Bush administration's request that an
American company,
Unical, construct the gas pipeline and in response President Bush said to
the Taliban that the
United States would attack them in October 2001. We did.
The Bush administration's purpose in planning and orchestrating 9/11 was
to create an
atmosphere of fear in this country so that the
military/industrial/oil/private central banking
complex could start their fake war on terror which included attacking
Afghanistan and Iraq and
probably Iran in the near future. None of this would have been possible
without the United
States Congress and the cor****ately owned mainstream media being complicit
in so far as not
questioning the official 9/11 conspiracy theory but in fact labeling
anyone who does question
the official 9/11 conspiracy theory as a "conspiracy nut".
Why is it that neither the United States Congress nor the mainstream media
question the
counting of our votes by electronic voting machines made by companies
owned and controlled by
neoconservative Republicans? It has been shown extensively and publicly
that these electronic
voting machines are completely hackable, even remotely, by a high school
student. Nevertheless,
these machines count approximately 80% of our votes. Why is it that the
United States Congress
does not require the manufacturers of these machines to make the internal
software available
for inspection by us before and after these machines count our votes.
Why is it that only Ron Paul speaks out about the scam of the Federal
Reserve Bank? Go to my
website where I have several streaming videos on my homepage that simply
and clearly explain
the scam that the Federal Reserve Bank perpetrates on all of us and has
done so since its
creation. What they call a "business cycle" is actually an intentional
manipulation of the
money supply for the sole benefit of the cartel of private banks that own
the Federal Reserve
Bank. The Federal Reserve Bank prints money and then lends it to this
government at interest.
Much of our income tax payments go to paying the interest on this loan of
paper money that has
no backing.
We must not vote for anyone who does not speak out about the lies and
deceptions regarding
9/11, the removal of all electronic voting machines from the election
process and the
termination of the Federal Reserve Bank. Of course, there must be term
limits and only public
financing of national elections.
Joseph A. Lopisi is an attorney and the webmaster of www.911insidejob.net.
He is the cofounder
of the Massachusetts 9/11 Truth Group and is a member of the Coalition
against Election Fraud.
You can contact him through the e-mail function on his website.
|
