Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > British > Re: Some Of The...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 9 Topic 41372 of 47786
Post > Topic >>

Re: Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11

by "Plastic Jesus" <MTRP@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Feb 8, 2008 at 01:25 PM

Bush and Cheney lose their diplomatic immunity soon.

So why not send them to the Hague on war crimes charges?

They did in fact lie about the reasons for going to war i.e. fraud and now

over 5000 Americans are dead, not to mention soldiers of other nations and

hundreds of thousands of Iraqis.



"VTR" <Vtar@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message 
news:cu-dnRuOIeobFjHanZ2dnUVZ_uKpnZ2d@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
>
> By Joseph A. Lopisi
>
> 08 February, 2008
>
>
> It is hard to pick a place to start in terms of talking about the most 
> outrageous lies that the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission
have 
> presented to the people in this country as a reason to attack
Afghanistan 
> and Iraq and to launch a "fake war on terror".
>
> The reason I say this is that I have been reading articles and watching 
> videos about the lies and deceptions surrounding 9/11 for the past three

> years. If anything, there are so many obvious unanswered questions about

> 9/11. However, not only has no one answered any of these questions but
in 
> fact no one in the mainstream media nor anyone in the United States 
> Congress except for Representative Kucinich and Cynthia McKinney have
even 
> asked these questions.
>
> Some of these questions are:
>
> 1. How is it that at the crash site of Flight 93, NBC and Fox News on 
> September 11, 2001 re****ted on the scene with video coverage that there 
> was no sign of a jetliner, engines, bodies or luggage? You can go to my 
> website which is www.911insidejob.net and watch this video re****t which
is 
> on my home page. It has never been shown again on the mainstream media.
>
> 2. How is it that three steel framed buildings on September 11, 2001
fell 
> in freefall time on their footprint? If you watch the two Towers
collapse, 
> it is obvious that they are being blown up. No steel framed building
prior 
> to this date or after this date has ever collapsed due to fire. Many
steel 
> framed buildings have experienced burning infernos for many hours and 
> never collapsed. WTC 7, a 50 story steel framed building, had two small 
> fires in it with no noticeable structural damage when it collapsed on
his 
> footprint in freefall time at about 5:40 p.m. on September 11. You can 
> watch this building collapse on the homepage my website.
>
> 3. How is it that the most protected building in the world, the
Pentagon, 
> was hit by a commercial jetliner that was being tracked by Vice
President 
> Cheney in the basement of the White House for over one hour? 
> Trans****tation Secretary Mineta testified under oath that he witnessed a

> member of the United States military ask Vice President Cheney several 
> times whether the order still stood relative to not shooting down the 
> oncoming plane. Vice President Cheney's answer was that the order still 
> stands. You can watch Secretary Mineta's testimony on the home page of
my 
> website. The Pentagon is protected by a battery of antiaircraft guns
that 
> would automatically shoot down any plane that does not have a United 
> States military transponder on it.
>
> 4. How is it that only five frames have been presented by this
government 
> to show supposedly what hit the Pentagon on that date. The Pentagon has 
> surveillance cameras ringing the top exterior ring of the building. The 
> FBI within 10 minutes of the attack were confiscating surveillance films

> from local businesses around the Pentagon. None of these confiscated 
> surveillance films have been released. I would bet that a satellite sits

> above Wa****ngton, DC 24 hours every day and would have very good video 
> images showing what hit the Pentagon.
>
> 5. How is it that a large commercial jetliner was able to crash into the

> first floor of the Pentagon and punch a round hole through three rings
of 
> the Pentagon which is constructed of steel reinforced concrete? The nose

> of a commercial jetliner is made of aluminum.
>
> 6. Why is it that Jamie McIntyre of CNN re****ted on the front lawn of
the 
> Pentagon on September 11 that from his vantage point it did not look
like 
> a commercial jetliner had crashed into the Pentagon? Why is it that this

> re****t has never been shown on mainstream media but can be seen on my 
> website? Why is it that we have not heard another word from Jamie
McIntyre 
> or CNN regarding this re****t?
>
> 7. How was it that four commercial airliners were able to roam at will
the 
> northeastern sector of the United States without being intercepted? Of 
> course, Flight 93 was intercepted and shot down by the US military. The 
> northeastern sector of the United States is the most protected airspace
in 
> the world. There are several Air Force bases very close to Wa****ngton,
DC 
> and no jets from these Air Force bases came close to intercepting the 
> plane that hit the Pentagon, despite the fact that Vice President Cheney

> knew the plane was heading towards Wa****ngton, DC for almost an hour.
>
> I could go on and on but I will leave that to those who consider the
truth 
> about what happened on 9/11 to be im****tant. You can go to my website or

> many other 9/11 websites and start reading about how outrageous the 
> official 9/11 story is. You can go to www.youtube.com and watch five 
> videos that I have produced under my call name which is
"bushguiltyof911".
>
> Vice President Cheney met with the heads of the various oil companies 
> right after Bush took office. When the public wanted to know who was
there 
> and what they were talking about, Vice President Cheney fought this 
> request to the United States Supreme Court (the same court that elected 
> George Bush in 2000) where he won. They were talking about attacking
Iraq 
> in order to gain control of their oil fields. They were talking about 
> attacking Afghanistan to take over the construction of a gas pipeline 
> through Afghanistan. The Taliban, prior to September 11, 2001, had
already 
> said no to the Bush administration's request that an American company, 
> Unical, construct the gas pipeline and in response President Bush said
to 
> the Taliban that the United States would attack them in October 2001. We

> did.
>
> The Bush administration's purpose in planning and orchestrating 9/11 was

> to create an atmosphere of fear in this country so that the 
> military/industrial/oil/private central banking complex could start
their 
> fake war on terror which included attacking Afghanistan and Iraq and 
> probably Iran in the near future. None of this would have been possible 
> without the United States Congress and the cor****ately owned mainstream 
> media being complicit in so far as not questioning the official 9/11 
> conspiracy theory but in fact labeling anyone who does question the 
> official 9/11 conspiracy theory as a "conspiracy nut".
>
> Why is it that neither the United States Congress nor the mainstream
media 
> question the counting of our votes by electronic voting machines made by

> companies owned and controlled by neoconservative Republicans? It has
been 
> shown extensively and publicly that these electronic voting machines are

> completely hackable, even remotely, by a high school student. 
> Nevertheless, these machines count approximately 80% of our votes. Why
is 
> it that the United States Congress does not require the manufacturers of

> these machines to make the internal software available for inspection by

> us before and after these machines count our votes.
>
> Why is it that only Ron Paul speaks out about the scam of the Federal 
> Reserve Bank? Go to my website where I have several streaming videos on
my 
> homepage that simply and clearly explain the scam that the Federal
Reserve 
> Bank perpetrates on all of us and has done so since its creation. What 
> they call a "business cycle" is actually an intentional manipulation of 
> the money supply for the sole benefit of the cartel of private banks
that 
> own the Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Reserve Bank prints money and 
> then lends it to this government at interest. Much of our income tax 
> payments go to paying the interest on this loan of paper money that has
no 
> backing.
>
> We must not vote for anyone who does not speak out about the lies and 
> deceptions regarding 9/11, the removal of all electronic voting machines

> from the election process and the termination of the Federal Reserve
Bank. 
> Of course, there must be term limits and only public financing of
national 
> elections.
>
> Joseph A. Lopisi is an attorney and the webmaster of
www.911insidejob.net. 
> He is the cofounder of the Massachusetts 9/11 Truth Group and is a
member 
> of the Coalition against Election Fraud. You can contact him through the

> e-mail function on his website.
 




 9 Posts in Topic:
Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
VTR <Vtar@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-02-08 12:04:12 
Re: Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
"Plastic Jesus"  2008-02-08 13:25:33 
Re: Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
dk@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (DK  2008-02-08 19:07:11 
Re: Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
"Plastic Jesus"  2008-02-08 15:24:04 
Re: Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
dk@[EMAIL PROTECTED] (DK  2008-02-08 21:37:06 
Re: Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
"captain." <  2008-02-08 22:24:25 
Re: Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
"Plastic Jesus"  2008-02-08 20:17:47 
Re: Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
"captain." <  2008-02-11 06:23:26 
Re: Some Of The Outrageous Lies About 9/11
"ElParedon" <  2008-02-08 17:15:12 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 0:56:17 CST 2008.