2300 YEARS OLD ADVICE FOR THOSE SIDING WITH MUSLIMS :
Feeding a s**** with milk increases its venom, no nectar is produced.
- Cha****ya
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BOOK EXTRACTS FROM AN EX MUSLIM -
I was myself a Saudi slave like them till ten year back. I am now free
person, no more bound by facing towards Saudia. Salutations to person
like Jimmy who says that Islam was invented by an Arab for Arabs, for
low or no IQ, whose upper compartment is missing. Islam is not a
religion, but sect or an Arab movement which has enslaved so called
entire Islamic community for the sole benefit of Saudi Arabia. I
implore you all to understand this fact and try to remember your
ancesstors, their rich heritage. Below article posted by my dear
friend Dr. Ahmad Bhutto is challege to everyone to prove it wrong.
The text of the crucial Vikramaditya inscription, found inscribed on a
gold dish hung inside the Kaaba shrine in Mecca, is found recorded on
page 315 of a volume known as 'Sayar-ul-Okul' treasured in the Makhtab-
e-Sultania library in Istanbul, Turkey. Rendered in free English the
inscription says:
Fortunate are those who were born (and lived) during king Vikram's
reign. He was a noble, generous dutiful ruler, devoted to the welfare
of his subjects. But at that time we Arabs, oblivious of God, were
lost in sensual pleasures.
Plotting and torture were rampant. The darkness of ignorance had
enveloped our country. Like the lamb struggling for her life in the
cruel paws of a wolf we Arabs were caught up in ignorance. The entire
country was enveloped in a darkness so intense as on a new moon night.
But the present dawn and pleasant sun****ne of education is the result
of the favour of the noble king Vikramaditya whose benevolent
supervision did not lose sight of us- foreigners as we were. He spread
his sacred religion amongst us and sent scholars whose brilliance
shone like that of the sun from his country to ours. These scholars
and preceptors through whose benevolence we were once again made
cognisant of the presence of God, introduced to His sacred existence
and put on the road of Truth, had come to our country to preach their
religion and impart education at king Vikramaditya's behest."
For those who would like to read the Arabic wording I reproduce it
hereunder in Roman script:
"Itrashaphai Santu Ibikramatul Phahalameen Karimun Yartapheeha
Wayosassaru Bihillahaya Samaini Ela Motakabberen Sihillaha Yuhee Quid
min howa Yapakhara phajjal asari nahone osirom bayjayhalem. Yundan
blabin Kajan blnaya khtoryaha sadunya kanateph netephi bejehalin
Atadari bilamasa- rateen phakef tasabuhu kaunnieja majekaralhada
walador. As hmiman burukankad toluho watastaru hihila Yakajibaymana
balay kulk amarena phaneya jaunabilamary Bikramatum".
(Page 315 Sayar-ul-okul).
[Note: The title 'Saya-ul-okul' signifies memorable words.]
A careful analysis of the above inscription enables us to draw the
following conclusions:
1.. That the ancient Indian empires were extended up to the eastern
boundaries of Arabia until Vikramaditya and that it was he who for the
first time conquered Arabia. Because the inscription says that king
Vikram who dispelled the darkness of ignorance from Arabia.
2.. That, whatever their earlier faith, King Vikrama's preachers had
succeeded in spreading the Vedic (based on the Vedas, the Hindu sacred
scriptures)) way of life in Arabia.
3.. That the knowledge of Indian arts and sciences was imparted by
Indians to the Arabs directly by founding schools, academies and
cultural centres. The belief, therefore, that visiting Arabs conveyed
that knowledge to their own lands through their own indefatigable
efforts and scholar****p is unfounded.
Having seen the far reaching and history shaking implications of the
Arabic inscription concerning king Vikrama, we shall now piece
together the story of its find. How it came to be recorded and hung in
the Kaaba in Mecca. What are the other proofs reinforcing the belief
that Arabs were once followers of the Indian Vedic way of life and
that tranquillity and education were ushered into Arabia by king
Vikramaditya's scholars, educationists from an uneasy period of
"ignorance and turmoil" mentioned in the inscription.
In Istanbul, Turkey, there is a famous library called Makhatab-e-
Sultania, which is reputed to have the largest collection of ancient
West Asian literature. In the Arabic section of that library is an
anthology of ancient Arabic poetry. That anthology was compiled from
an earlier work in A.D. 1742 under the orders of the Turkish ruler
Sultan Salim.
The pages of that volume are of Hareer - a kind of silk used for
writing on. Each page has a decorative gilded border. That anthology
is known as Sayar-ul-Okul. It is divided into three parts. The first
part contains biographic details and the poetic compositions of pre-
Islamic Arabian poets. The second part embodies accounts and verses of
poets of the period beginning just after Mohammad's times, up to the
end of the Banee-Um-Mayya dynasty. The third part deals with later
poets up to the end of Khalif Harun-al-Ra****d's times.
Abu Amir Asamai, an Arabian bard who was the poet Laureate of Harun-al-
Ra****d's court, has compiled and edited the anthology.
The first modern edition of 'Sayar-ul-Okul' was printed and published
in Berlin in 1864. A subsequent edition is the one published in Beirut
in 1932.
The collection is regarded as the most im****tant and authoritative
anthology of ancient Arabic poetry. It throws considerable light on
the social life, customs, manners and entertainment modes of ancient
Arabia. The book also contains an elaborate description of the ancient
shrine of Mecca, the town and the annual fair known as OKAJ which used
to be held every year around the Kaaba temple in Mecca. This should
convince readers that the annual haj of the Muslims to the Kaaba is of
earlier pre-Islamic congregation.
But the OKAJ fair was far from a carnival. It provided a forum for the
elite and the learned to discuss the social, religious, political,
literary and other aspects of the Vedic culture then pervading Arabia.
'Sayar-ul-Okul' asserts that the conclusion reached at those
discussions were widely respected throughout Arabia. Mecca, therefore,
followed the Varanasi tradition (of India) of providing a venue for
im****tant discussions among the learned while the m***** congregated
there for spiritual bliss. The principal shrines at both Varanasi in
India and at Mecca in Arvasthan (Arabia) were Siva temples. Even to
this day ancient Mahadev (Siva) emblems can be seen. It is the
Shankara (Siva) stone that Muslim pilgrims reverently touch and kiss
in the Kaaba.
Arabic tradition has lost trace of the founding of the Kaaba temple.
The discovery of the Vikramaditya inscription affords a clue. King
Vikramaditya is known for his great devotion to Lord Mahadev (Siva).
At Ujjain (India), the capital of Vikramaditya, exists the famous
shrine of Mahankal, i.e., of Lord Shankara (Siva) associated with
Vikramaditya. Since according to the Vikramaditya inscription he
spread the Vedic religion, who else but he could have founded the
Kaaba temple in Mecca?
read the full book in pdf from the following file section
http://groups.google.co.in/group/cyber-hindu-warriors?hl=en
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
2300 YEARS OLD ADVICE FOR THOSE SIDING WITH MUSLIMS :
Feeding a s**** with milk increases its venom, no nectar is produced.
- Cha****ya
|
