Pega wrote:
> VTR wrote:
>
>> Some of these questions are:
>
> I'll answer them for you bud.
>
>>
>> 1. How is it that at the crash site of Flight 93, NBC and Fox News on
>> September 11, 2001 re****ted on the scene with video coverage that
>> there was no sign of a jetliner, engines, bodies or luggage?
>
> That's cause they went to all that trouble to concoct this conspiracy
> thingy but could not find any luggage, engines, bodies or a jetliner.
> All they could find was this rocket ****p thingy, or a missile. Dumb
them.
Nothing larger than a size of phone book could be found, no engine, no
parts of a plane wings.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/shootdown.html
>
>> 2. How is it that three steel framed buildings on September 11, 2001
>> fell in freefall time on their footprint?
>
> Err... Large fully tanked jetliners hit them head on at maximum speed?
> That might do something to a building.
World Trade Center 7 was a 47 story steel building that was not hit by a
plane and had no major
fires, however it collapsed in less than 7 sec in the same manner they do
controlled demolition.
The Twin Towers were designed to withstand several plans to hit it,
without causing a collapse.
see 9/11 mysteries.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871&q
>
> If you watch the two Towers
>> collapse, it is obvious that they are being blown up.
>
> That would be obvious only to a retard.
>
>>
>> 3. How is it that the most protected building in the world,
>
> Just goes to show how protected that building was, doesn't it?
The entry hole is too small for a Jet of that size, and to say that a
loser pilot who had
trouble flying a Cessna could have flew a plane in this manner that is the
impossible.
http://physics911.net/omholt
>
|
