I am done with you. All the answers you need are provided to you on my
other posts to the other stupid in this same thread, be gone.
VTR wrote:
> Pega wrote:
>> VTR wrote:
>>
>>> Some of these questions are:
>>
>> I'll answer them for you bud.
>>
>>>
>>> 1. How is it that at the crash site of Flight 93, NBC and Fox News on
>>> September 11, 2001 re****ted on the scene with video coverage that
>>> there was no sign of a jetliner, engines, bodies or luggage?
>>
>> That's cause they went to all that trouble to concoct this conspiracy
>> thingy but could not find any luggage, engines, bodies or a jetliner.
>> All they could find was this rocket ****p thingy, or a missile. Dumb
them.
>
> Nothing larger than a size of phone book could be found, no engine, no
> parts of a plane wings.
> http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/shootdown.html
>
>>
>>> 2. How is it that three steel framed buildings on September 11, 2001
>>> fell in freefall time on their footprint?
>>
>> Err... Large fully tanked jetliners hit them head on at maximum speed?
>> That might do something to a building.
>
> World Trade Center 7 was a 47 story steel building that was not hit by a
> plane and had no major fires, however it collapsed in less than 7 sec in
> the same manner they do controlled demolition.
>
> The Twin Towers were designed to withstand several plans to hit it,
> without causing a collapse.
> see 9/11 mysteries.
>
> http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8172271955308136871&q
>
>>
>> If you watch the two Towers
>>> collapse, it is obvious that they are being blown up.
>>
>> That would be obvious only to a retard.
>>
>>>
>>> 3. How is it that the most protected building in the world,
>>
>> Just goes to show how protected that building was, doesn't it?
>
> The entry hole is too small for a Jet of that size, and to say that a
> loser pilot who had trouble flying a Cessna could have flew a plane in
> this manner that is the impossible.
> http://physics911.net/omholt
>
>>
|
