Hotblack Desiato wrote:
> "Pega" <Peg@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> news:KLsBj.308967$GI1.289498@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Hotblack Desiato wrote:
>>> No answer again. You promised a lot and delivered next to nothing..
well
>>> done.. an improvement on nothing at all
>> There you go chum, all the answers you need:
>>
>>
http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/outgoing.cgi?u=http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html
>> http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military_law/1227842.html
>> http://wtc.nist.gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006.htm
>>
>
> The popular mechanics article cited, has been debated and questioned on
many
> fronts by many people... Google ....
How about the NIST?
>
> Still,
> freefall is a little difficult to accept.
First off, it was not a free fall, though close.
Second, this is what I don't understand about the conspiracy theorists
that are honest, sincere. That they have trouble "accepting" what has
transpired in front of their eyes.
Now those profiteering s*** like the "loose change" type, that actually
are living off the 911 conspiracy theory industry, I understand, I know
why they spew intentional bull**** and dumbdumb; they earn money off of
it. But the honest guys, I don't understand why anybody in their right
mind would think that the fact that wtc7 went down some hours later in
the way that it did go down, that it is a proof of the conspiracy. Just
think for a moment, if you would be concocting such an assassination to
your own country wouldn't you be AVOIDING such suspicion arousing
actions as brining down buildings in a controlled demolition manner
hours after the main event? And WHY would they need to do such a thing?
They can restrict access to anything and everything, WHY WOULD THEY NEED
TO BLOW UP A BUILDING JUST TO DESTROY SOME DO***ENTS!?!?! as some
moronic CT's suggest? Why would they claim that a plane went down in the
plains of shanksville and NOT bring down a plane there? Why would they
explode a missile over at the pentagon in the first place? Isn't what
happened at the WTC ENOUGH to start a war on any nation on ANY scale?
>
> The Popular Mechanics article really doesn't answer...
Just read up on the other sites also and think with some common sense
for a while. Most of the CT bull**** turns in on itself when you think
for a mere split second as to the underlying reasons.
OTOH, I do agree that criminal bush and his gang are much capable of
doing MUCH more damage, intentional damage, to their own people, we all
KNOW that that's a fact as it is transpriring before our own eyes, the
damage they can do. There might be other aspects, other conspiracies
yes, but this one was what happened as it happened.
|
