Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > British > Re: PEDOPHILIA:...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 2 of 2 Topic 41808 of 47796
Post > Topic >>

Re: PEDOPHILIA: THE TALMUD'S DIRTY SECRET

by Anti-Muslim Bigots <AntiZionism@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 11, 2008 at 01:45 PM

No such thing exist in Islam, it exists in the Jewish Holly book, go to the
link for copies
from the Jewish Holly book or buy it and check it yourself.
http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret.html


PEDOPHILIA: THE TALMUD'S DIRTY SECRET

By Rev. Ted Pike
11 Oct 06

For nearly a century, the Jewish-dominated Hollywood film industry and big
media have 
conspicuously influenced Christian America away from Biblical morals and
values. (See, "Jews 
Confirm Big Media Is Jewish")

Yet, with the hippie rebellion of the early sixties, the Jewish media
found exponential 
op****tunities to hasten America’s moral decline. Encouraging drugs and
****ography it persuaded 
America that "free love" and living together outside of marriage were
socially acceptable. With 
astoni****ng rapidity the movie, TV, and print media helped produce a
generation of ***ual 
libertines. By the end of the sixties, it hastened the ***ual revolution
to its next stage, 
homo***uality.

Now, more than 40 years later, even homo***uality has lost its attraction
to many children and 
grandchildren of the hippie generation. Pedophilia (*** with little boys
and girls along with 
child ****ography) is the latest underground obsession sweeping America
and the world.

Last fall, I alerted the nation to the power of the pedophile lobby in
Congress; Sen. Edward 
Kennedy, long backed by homo***uals in sup****t of the federal anti-hate
bill, betrayed them to 
favor the evidently more powerful and rewarding pedophiles. (See "How
Kennedy and His 
Pedophiles Weakened the Child Safety Bill")

Rotten Roots

What kind of moral foundations do Jews of the media rest upon, that they
could consciously 
ignite and fan the flames of a ***ual inferno that continues to ravage our
once Christian society?

Virtually all the media moguls who founded Hollywood and the big three TV
networks were 
immigrants, or their children, from predominantly orthodox Jewish
communities in Eastern Europe.

In the late 19th century, most European Jews were a people of the book.
But their book wasn’t 
the Bible. It was the Babylonian Talmud. To this day, the Talmud remains
Judaism’s highest 
moral, ethical and legal authority.

Does the Talmud share Christianity's foundation of wholesome moral values?
Hardly. Instead, the 
Talmud is the sleazy substrata of a religious system gone terribly astray;
it is that code of 
Pharisaic unbelief Christ described as "full of all uncleanness" (Matt.
23:27). Shockingly, 
Judaism’s most revered authority actually endorses such sins as lying,
oath-breaking, and 
indirect murder. And it even sanctions one of the greatest sins of all:
child molestation.

Three Year Old Brides

When Christ accused the Pharisees of His day of being Satan’s spiritual
children, He fully 
realized what they were capable of. Second century Rabbi Simeon ben Yohai,
one of Judaism’s 
very greatest rabbis and a creator of Kabbalah, sanctioned
pedophilia—permitting molestation of 
baby girls even younger than three! He proclaimed, “A proselyte who is
under the age of three 
years and a day is permitted to marry a priest.” 1 Subsequent rabbis refer
to ben Yohai’s 
endorsement of pedophilia as "halakah," or binding Jewish law. 2 Has ben
Yohai, child rape 
advocate, been disowned by modern Jews? Hardly. Today, in ben Yohai’s
hometown of Meron, 
Israel, tens of thousands of orthodox and ultra-orthodox Jews gather
annually for days and 
nights of singing and dancing in his memory.

References to pedophilia abound in the Talmud. They occupy considerable
sections of Treatises 
Kethuboth and Yebamoth and are enthusiastically endorsed by the Talmud’s
definitive legal work, 
Treatise Sanhedrin.

The Pharisees Endorsed Child ***

The rabbis of the Talmud are notorious for their legal hairsplitting, and
quibbling debates. 
But they share rare agreement about their right to molest three year old
girls. In contrast to 
many hotly debated issues, hardly a hint of dissent rises against the
prevailing opinion 
(expressed in many clear passages) that pedophilia is not only normal but
scriptural as well! 
It’s as if the rabbis have found an exalted truth whose majesty silences
debate.

Because the Talmudic authorities who sanction pedophilia are so renowned,
and because 
pedophilia as “halakah” is so explicitly emphasized, not even the
translators of the Soncino 
edition of the Talmud (1936) dared insert a footnote suggesting the
slightest criticism. They 
only comment: “Marriage, of course, was then at a far earlier age than
now.” 3

In fact, footnote 5 to Sanhedrin 60b rejects the right of a Talmudic rabbi
to disagree with ben 
Yohai's endorsement of pedophilia: "How could they [the rabbis], contrary
to the opinion of R. 
Simeon ben Yohai, which has scriptural sup****t, forbid the marriage of the
young proselyte?" 4

Out of Babylon

It was in Babylon after the exile under Nebuchadnezzar in 597 BC that
Judaism's leading sages 
probably began to indulge in pedophilia. Babylon was the staggeringly
immoral capitol of the 
ancient world. For 1600 years, the world’s largest population of Jews
flourished within it.

As an example of their evil, Babylonian priests said a man's religious
duty included regular 
*** with temple prostitutes. Bestiality was widely tolerated. So
Babylonians hardly cared 
whether a rabbi married a three year old girl.

But with expulsion of the Jews in the 11th century AD, mostly to western
Christian lands, 
Gentile tolerance of Jewish pedophilia abruptly ended.

Still, a shocking contradiction lingers: If Jews want to revere the
transcendent wisdom and 
moral guidance of the Pharisees and their Talmud, they must accept the
right of their greatest 
ancient sages to violate children. To this hour, no synod of Judaism has
repudiated their vile 
practice.

*** with a “Minor” Permitted

What exactly did these sages say?

The Pharisees justified child rape by explaining that a boy of nine years
was not a “man” (See, 
"Judaism and Homo***uality: A Marriage Made in Hell") Thus they exempted
him from God’s Mosaic 
Law: “You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an
abomination” (Lev. 
18:22) One passage in the Talmud gives permission for a woman who molested
her young son to 
marry a high priest. It concludes, “All agree that the connection of a boy
aged nine years and 
a day is a real connection; whilst that of one less than eight years is
not." 5 Because a boy 
under 9 is ***ually immature, he can't "throw guilt" on the active
offender, morally or legally. 6

A woman could molest a young boy without questions of morality even being
raised: "…the 
intercourse of a small boy is not regarded as a ***ual act." 7 The Talmud
also says, "A male 
aged nine years and a day who cohabits with his deceased brother's wife
acquires her (as 
wife)." 8 Clearly, the Talmud teaches that a woman is permitted to marry
and have *** with a 
nine year old boy.

*** at Three Years and One Day

In contrast to Simeon ben Yohai's dictum that *** with a little girl is
permitted under the age 
of three years, the general teaching of the Talmud is that the rabbi must
wait until a day 
after her third birthday. She could be taken in marriage simply by the act
of rape.

     R. Joseph said: Come and hear! A maiden aged three years and a day
may be acquired in 
marriage by coition and if her deceased husband’s brother cohabits with
her, she becomes his. 
(Sanh. 55b)

     A girl who is three years of age and one day may be betrothed by
cohabitation. . . .(Yeb. 57b)

     A maiden aged three years and a day may be acquired in marriage by
coition, and if her 
deceased husband’s brother cohabited with her she becomes his. (Sanh. 69a,
69b, also discussed 
in Yeb. 60b)

     It was taught: R. Simeon b. Yohai stated: A proselyte who is under
the age of three years 
and one day is permitted to marry a priest, for it is said, But all the
women children that 
have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves, and
Phineas (who was priest, 
the footnote says) surely was with them. (Yeb. 60b)

     [The Talmud says such three year and a day old girls are] . . . fit
for cohabitation. . . 
But all women children, that have not known man by lying with him, it must
be concluded that 
Scripture speaks of one who is fit for cohabitation. (Footnote to Yeb.
60b)

The example of Phineas, a priest, himself marrying an underage virgin of
three years is 
considered by the Talmud as proof that such infants are "fit for
cohabitation."

The Talmud teaches that an adult woman’s molestation of a nine year old
boy is "not a ***ual 
act" and cannot "throw guilt" upon her because the little boy is not truly
a "man.” 9 But they 
use opposite logic to sanction rape of little girls aged three years and
one day: Such infants 
they count as “women," ***ually mature and fully responsible to comply
with the requirements of 
marriage.

The Talmud footnotes 3 and 4 to Sanhedrin 55a clearly tell us when the
rabbis considered a boy 
and girl ***ually mature and thus ready for marriage. "At nine years a
male attains ***ual 
matureness… The ***ual matureness of woman is reached at the age of
three."

No Rights for Child Victims

The Pharisees were hardly ignorant of the trauma felt by molested
children. To complicate 
redress, the Talmud says a rape victim must wait until she was of age
before there would be any 
possibility of restitution. She must prove that she lived and would live
as a devoted Jewess, 
and she must protest the loss of her virginity on the very hour she comes
of age. “As soon as 
she was of age one hour and did not protest she cannot protest any more.”
10

The Talmud defends these strict measures as necessary to forestall the
possibility of a Gentile 
child bride rebelling against Judaism and spending the damages awarded to
her as a heathen - an 
unthinkable blasphemy! But the rights of the little girl were really of no
great consequence, 
for, "When a grown-up man has intercourse with a little girl it is
nothing, for when the girl 
is less than this (three years and a day) it is as if one put the finger
into the eye." The 
footnote says that as “tears come to the eye again and again, so does
virginity come back to 
the little girl under three years.” 11

In most cases, the Talmud affirms the innocence of male and female victims
of pedophilia. 
Defenders of the Talmud claim this proves the Talmud's amazing moral
advancement and 
benevolence toward children; they say it contrasts favorably with
"primitive" societies where 
the child would have been stoned along with the adult perpetrator.

Actually, the rabbis, from self-protection, were intent on proving the
innocence of both 
parties involved in pedophilia: the child, but more im****tantly, the
pedophile. They stripped a 
little boy of his right to "throw guilt" on his assailant and demanded
complicity in *** from a 
little girl. By thus providing no significant moral or legal recourse for
the child, the Talmud 
clearly reveals whose side it is on: the raping rabbi.

Pedophilia Widespread

Child rape was practiced in the highest circles of Judaism. This is
illustrated from Yeb. 60b:

     There was a certain town in the land of Israel the legitimacy of
whose inhabitants was 
disputed, and Rabbi sent R. Romanos who conducted an inquiry and found in
it the daughter of a 
proselyte who was under the age of three years and one day, and Rabbi
declared her eligible to 
live with a priest.

The footnote says that she was “married to a priest” and the rabbi simply
permitted her to live 
with her husband, thus upholding “halakah” as well as the dictum of Simeon
ben Yohai, “A 
proselyte who is under the age of three years and one day is permitted to
marry a priest.” 12

These child brides were expected to submit willingly to ***. Yeb. 12b
confirms that under 
eleven years and one day a little girl is not permitted to use a
contraceptive but “must carry 
on her marital intercourse in the usual manner.”

In Sanhedrin 76b a blessing is given to the man who marries off his
children before they reach 
the age of puberty, with a contrasting curse on anyone who waits longer.
In fact, failure to 
have married off one’s daughter by the time she is 12-1/2, the Talmud
says, is as bad as one 
who “returns a lost article to a Cuthean” (Gentile) - a deed for which
“the Lord will not spare 
him.” 13 This passage says: “… it is meritorious to marry off one’s
children whilst minors.”

The mind reels at the damage to the untold numbers of girls who were
***ually abused within 
Judaism during the heyday of pedophilia. Such child abuse, definitely
practiced in the second 
century, continued, at least in Babylon, for another 900 years.

A Fascination with ***

Perusing the Talmud, one is overwhelmed with the recurrent preoccupation
with ***, especially 
by the most eminent rabbis. Dozens of illustrations could be presented to
illustrate the 
delight of the Pharisees to discuss *** and quibble over its minutest
details.

The rabbis endorsing child *** undoubtedly practiced what they preached.
Yet to this hour, 
their words are revered. Simeon ben Yohai is honored by Orthodox Jews as
one of the very 
greatest sages and spiritual lights the world has ever known. A member of
the earliest 
"Tannaim," rabbis most influential in creating the Talmud, he carries more
authority to 
observant Jews than Moses.

Today, the Talmud’s outspoken pedophiles and child-rape advocates would
doubtlessly spend hard 
time in prison for child molestation. Yet here is what the eminent Jewish
scholar, Dagobert 
Runes (who is fully aware of all these passages), says about such “dirty
old men” and their 
perverted teachings:

     There is no truth whatever in Christian and other strictures against
the Pharisees, who 
represented the finest traditions of their people and of human morals. 14

Aren’t Christ’s words more appropriate?

     Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto
whited sepulchres, 
which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s
bones, and of all 
uncleanness. Even so ye also outwardly appear righteous unto men, but
within ye are full of 
hypocrisy and iniquity. (Matthew 23:27, 28.)

(Adapted from Ted Pike's book, Israel: Our Duty, Our Dilemma)

Endnotes:

1 Yebamoth 60b, p. 402.
2 Yebamoth 60b, p. 403.
3 Sanhedrin 76a.
4 In Yebamoth 60b, p. 404, Rabbi Zera disagrees that *** with girls under
three years and one 
day should be endorsed as halakah.
5 Sanhedrin 69b.
6 Sanhedrin 55a.
7 Footnote 1 to Kethuboth 11b.
8 Sanhedrin 55b.
9 Sanhedrin 55a.
10 Kethuboth 11a.
11 Kethuboth 11b.
12 Yebamoth 60b.
13 Sanhedrin 76b.
14 Dagobert Runes, A Concise Dictionary of Judaism, New York, 1959.

http://www.truthtellers.org/alerts/pedophiliasecret.html
 




 2 Posts in Topic:
Islam allows sex with an infant girl!
Ajanta <ajanta@[EMAIL   2008-03-07 13:22:24 
Re: PEDOPHILIA: THE TALMUD'S DIRTY SECRET
Anti-Muslim Bigots <An  2008-03-11 13:45:18 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 8:14:35 CST 2008.