THE HANDY WORK OF SYMON HILL'S TERRORISTS
http://www.spur.asn.au/LTTE_Atrocities_20070528_Ratmalana_Bomb.htm
http://www.spur.asn.au/LTTE_Atrocities_20060615_Kebithigollewa_Massacre.htm
http://www.spur.asn.au/chronology_of_suicide_bomb_attacks_by_Tamil_Tigers_in_sri_Lanka.htm
http://www.spur.asn.au/After_signing_the_so-called_JM.htm
It is the quickness of the British Broadcasting Cor****ation (BBC)
which some think in terms of being a Biased Broadcasting Cor****ation
to feature the above topic that strikes many as amazing and almost as
though it was in agreement with the critic Symon Hill who belongs to
an anti arms trade campaigning group who has criticised the sale of
10,000 military missiles by Slovakia to Sri Lanka. Come now BBC can
you not do better than sing in unison with an canary who sounds as
though he just might be on the payroll of the Tamil Tiger terrorists
in their desperate hour ?
According to credible re****ts (if the credibility of the BBC is that
unquestionable!) Symon Hill, from the Campaign Against Arms Trade
(CAAT), has said the sale was "exactly what Sri Lanka doesn't need at
the moment". Curiously though! he has hadly touched on the burning
issue of those who attempt to supply arms to the Tamil Tiger
terrorists who are the real threat to civilians and has uttered hardly
a whimper in condemnation towards this although the World at large and
the entire Nation of Sri Lanka know the realities involved and the
price the Nation continues to pay as a direct result of the
particularly effective suppliers of arms to the LTTE! And then there
are some!
Indeed Sri Lanka has been engaged in a war against internationally
condemned terrorists and insurgents as opposed to the wrongly defined
'civil war' for 25 years and more albeit no civil war but an internal
armed insurrection by a group of directionless terrorists whose power
has been maintained upto now by the supplies of weapons from
surreptitious sources from various parts of the world. For the CAAT to
foment fears that, the weapons supplied through credible, legitimate
and acceptable sources to the Sovereign Nation of Sri Lanka engaged in
eradicating terrorists, may be used against civilians is a statement
of rank ignorance or steeped in bias in favour of the terrorists. No
rocket science necessary while no pun is intended!
Mr Hill has used the age old excuse with no tangible evidence or true
statistics that "there are many examples of the Sri Lankan Army being
accused of the killing of civilians, as often happens in civil wars"
the im****tance of the term ''being accused" takes precedence towards
the argument that accusations alone do not constitute proof of the
pudding where the examples refered to are more often exaggerated,
concocted or falsely ****trayed but there are indeed many examples of
the Armed Forces even at this very moment taking out in great numbers
terrorists who are an impediment to the smooth functioning and well
being of Sri Lanka and its citizens and if further fortification of
the Armed resources towards this task is necessary it has to be of no
concern to Mr Hill, The BBC or anyone else who harp on the theme as
they could very well be sup****ting the terrorist cause rather than
condoning the urgent need of Sri Lanka to make redundant through
military means the scourge which continues to threaten the Sovereign
Right towards existence and the unitarity of Sri Lanka ! Civilian
casualties most unfortunately are inevitable but may it be known that
the Government takes every precaution to protect them but the task
never made easy as the LTTE by choice and premeditation target
civilians and blame it on the Government.
A somewhat myopic reference has been made regarding the Code of
conduct of the Government of Sri Lanka where certain pundits in
accordance with the trend of thought expressed both by the BBC as well
as the obstreperous Mr Hill, in the guise of being self acclaimed
'Analysts' have had the affront to say that because the Sri Lankan
Government bans most independent observers from travelling to the war
affected areas, it is impossible to know the full truth.
Here one needs to lay down the role of the Government relative to
policies involving responsibilities towards safety as well as
authority in the matter, an inalienable right perhaps which if
waivable the independent observers in complaint might also consider
attempting to penetrate other global locales which have decided to ban
journalists for various reasons of which there are countless examples
so why the emphasis on Sri Lanka engaged in a war with nation
threatening dangerous terrorists? What of Burma, Tibet, Zimbabwe and
more( lesser entities towards the indemnities) where overall most
unfortunately hearsay rules but nevertheless a fact of life where Sri
Lanka deserves more than acollades for the concessions to Foreign
Journalists( and unwelcome dignitaries) who in turn and in rank
ingratitude sometimes re****t pure blarney laced in bias!!
The European Union, of which Slovakia is a member indeed has a Code of
Conduct on Arms Ex****ts, designed "to prevent the ex****t of equipment
which might be used for internal repression or international
aggression, or contribute to regional instability".
where contrary to Symon Hill of the CAAT's rationale which says that
the Code is "so weak, so vague, with so many loopholes" according to
his loose rhetoric it seems more of a personal interpretation where
the responsibilities of the organizations refered to are being
questioned perhaps in ignorance and which nevertheless remain rock
solid towards credibilities despite the accusations! where he somewhat
boldly adds that "the EU needs to be realistic about enforcing a code
of conduct.
Slovakia isn't the only country that appears to have broken the code"
but the bi partisan****p of the EU relative to its stance on Sri Lanka
of late points to the unim****tance of any code which could more than
likely be a creation of pro LTTE sympathy and worthless if it opposes
the Sovereign right of Sri Lanka to defend itself from terrorists and
fortify National Security!
The European Union's response to Mr Hill in retrospect however stands
to reason as well as being correct in saying that "how the code is
implemented is up to each member country. The Slovakian Economy
Ministry denies that the sale is in violation of the code where
emphatically the Ministry spokesman Branislav Zvara has said that "the
UN Security Council's evaluation of the situation in Sri Lanka has not
led it to declare an embargo on arms ****pments to the country" and
perhaps reason enough for Mr Hill to put up something more plausible
or shut up!
Final Note~ It should be of no consequence to the BBC or Mr Hill
whether the three-metre missiles are designed to be dispatched from
multiple rocket launchers, missile carrying attack craft or for that
matter old world catapults mounted atop bullock Carts as it is a
matter concerning the Security of a Sovereign Nation in defence of its
Sovereignity, Territorial Integrity and National Security from
terrorists and to even dare insinuate that the danger involved would
be the targetting of civillians is libellous talk against the Nation
of Sri Lanka, her administration and credibility where both sources
the BBC and Mr.Hill should exercise extreme caution about such loose
tonged and irresponsible dispensations!.
|
