"Topaz" <mars1933@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:aql814ds0estn45m13d51470q71fnqrdrp@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Here are some quotes from Brain ***, the Real Difference between men
> and women
> By Anne Moir And David Jessel
Manytimes science just explains things that we already knew from
experience.
And males are superior in every respect even in areas that were
predominately female like cooking, fa****on design mad even speaking. How
many great orators are female? You know of any radio talk show hosts that
are female who can hold your interest? The male is the dominant and
smarter
*** on average. This female may be very clever at memorising things but I
doubt she will ever come up with an original idea. It is in the female's
Nature to be safe and maintain the status quo and just use the things
created by men. Only men are capable of thought and innovation and even
here
it's only a small group of men. In the genius category only 2% are female
versus 98% male and as far as I know none of those females have ever done
anything except look smart.
read comments below...
>
> They are equal only in their common member****p of the species,
> humankind. To maintain that they are the same in aptitude, skill or
> behavior is to build a society based on a biological and scientific
> lie.
>
> The ***es are different because their brains are different. The brain,
> the chief administrative and emotional organ of life, is differently
> constructed in men and in women; it processes information in a
> different way, which results in different perceptions, priorities and
> behavior.
>
> Until recently, behavior differences between the ***es have been
> explained away by social conditioning - the expectations of parents,
> whose own attitudes, in turn, reflect the expectations of society;
> little boys are told that they shouldn't cry, and that the way to the
> top depends on masculine assertion and aggression. Scant attention was
> paid to the biological view that we may be what we are because of the
> way we are made. Today, there is too much new biological evidence for
> the sociological argument to prevail.
There always was and it was only in the last 50 years with the rise of
feminism that they tried to explain things in terms of environment and
conditioning. But men have always known it was the biological difference
that made the ***es what they are. Even when they had little knowledge of
science and explained things in terms of "humours" they knew that the
difference was inbred because they could easily see it in the females
around
them and in the animals in the wild and on farms.
>
> The biggest behavioral difference between men and women is the
> natural, innate aggression of men, which explains to a large degree
> their historical dominance of the species. Men didn't learn aggression
> as one the tactics of the *** war. We do not teach our boy children to
> be aggressive - indeed, we try vainly to unteach it. Even researchers
> most hostile to the acknowledgement of *** differences agree that this
> is a male feature, and one which cannot be explained away by social
> conditioning.
>
> There has seldom been a greater divide between what intelligent,
> enlightened opinion presumes - that men and women have the same brain
> - and what science knows - that they do not.
>
> It cannot be stressed often enough that this book concerns itself
> with the average man and the average woman.
>
> The area where the biggest differences have been found lies in what
> scientists call 'spatial ability'. That's being able to picture
> things, their shape, position, geography and pro****tion, accurately in
> the mind's eye - all skills that are crucial to the practical ability
> to work with three-dimensional objects or drawings. One scientist who
> has reviewed the extensive literature on the subject concludes, 'The
> fact of the male's superiority in spatial ability is not in dispute'.
> It is confirmed by literally hundreds of different scientific studies.
>
> 99 per cent of all patents applied for today are registered by men.
The proof is in the pudding and there is no need to analyse this. But I
wonder about that 1% and if some men didn't put their wives names down as
inventor for business purposes lol
>
> Scientists know that they walk on social eggshells when they venture
> any theory about human behavior. But researchers into *** differences
> are increasingly impatient with the polite attempt to find a social
> explanation for these differences. As Camilla Benbow now says now says
> of her studies showing male superiority in mathematically gifted
> children, 'After 15 years looking for an environmental explanation and
> getting zero results, I gave up.' She readily admitted to us her
> belief that the difference in ability has a biological basis.
>
> The differences are apparent in the very first hours after birth. It
> has been shown that girl babies are much more interested than boys in
> people and faces; the boys seem just as happy with an object dangled
> in front of them.
That's because females will always be infantile and dependant upon other
people and what they think of them for their existence. Men have nothing
in
common with females and except for *** (reproduction) men would be happier
playing with a machine or being with other men. A man who lives with a
female or marries is taking on a burden because he gains nothing from the
experience and it is a drain on his finances and emotion al health. It is
an
Inbred trait of the female to feel lonely if she doesn't have another
person
around her and she has an extremely low tolerance for being alone because
she is the one who will be with the children.
Ever notice that perfectly normal men can live alone but when you find a
female living alone she's almost always a crazy cat woman or a divorcee
looking to trap another man?
I wonder how a story like Robinson Crusoe would go over with a female
alone
on an island? It would probably seem so bizarre that no one would read it.
>
> Embryonic boy babies are exposed to a colossal dose of male hormone at
> the critical time when their brains are beginning to take shape.
>
> The brains of male and female mammals, from rodents to primates,
> exhibiting hormonally mediated differences in neuro-transmitter
> levels, neural connections, and cell and nuclear volume, strongly
> suggests that similar ***ual dimorphism of structure and function
> exists human brains as well.
>
> In women the functional division between the left and the right sides
> of the brain is less clearly defined. Both the left and the right
> sides of the female brain are involved in verbal and visual abilities.
> Men's brains are more specialized.
> The left side of the brain is almost exclusively set aside for the
> control or verbal abilities, the right side for visual.
Yes, and that's an added advantage for men in the event of head injury or
brain damage.
>
> And the latest research had shown that the more connections people
> have between the left and right hemispheres, the more articulate and
> fluent they are.
Actually it causes more confusion and disordered thinking. Men are the
best
communicators and orators. Females may make noise (talk) more than men but
they don't use more words. Women might write a lot of books but 9 out of
10
of the great writers are men.
The finding provides a further explanation for
> women's verbal dexterity.
That's nonsense. Stop by the House of Commons during PM question time and
compare the male and female ministers and see who's more dextrous. Listen
to
the radio and see who all the top talk shows are done by. I've tried to
listen to a couple of the top females in this area and was completely
bored
in a few minutes. How about female comedians? Know any good ones? lol
Females have no verbal dexterity, they just like to argue and annoy men
and
be the centre of attention because their arguments never have any
conclusion and are ongoing. It's all just chatter like listening to a
child.
But could the corpus callosum provide the
> answer to another mystery, could it provide a somewhat solution to the
> secret of female intuition? Is the physical capacity of a woman to
> connect and relate more pieces of information than a man explained not
> by witchcraft, after all, but merely by superior switchgear?
More nonsense and besides I think you're referring to a man here putting
information together. Sherlock Holmes perhaps? Watson is always amazed
until
Holmes tells him how it's done and it's done by deductive reasoning an
almost all male way of thinking.
If you really want to go crazy, try explaining what a generalisation is to
a
female lol
If you tell a female that falling out a 50 story building will kill you,
she'll find the one exception of a man who did and survived lol
The reason that females can't(or don't want to) understand what a
generalisation is, is obvious to a man of my experience. A female always
wants to think of herself as the exception to the rule; I'm different. I'm
not like most women etc etc etc In point of fact, females are all
interchangeable to a man and the only difference is age, looks and
personality. Females instinctually know this, and that men don't want just
one female, which is why they try to constantly change their appearance
with
clothes and makeup to give the appearance of being more than one woman and
incidentally to try to trap other men.
If you ask a female to name well known women who she thinks are good
looking, she'll almost always name aging actresses who are well over the
hill and not the hot 18 yo ones; the ones that men really want haha
Again, she does this because she knows her days of ***ual attraction are
limited and deludes herself into thinking that perhaps she at 40 will be
the
exception and still be ***ually desirable.
Since
> women are in general better at recognizing the emotional nuances in
> voice, gesture and facial expression, a whole range of sensory
> information. They can deduce more from such information because they
> have a greater capacity than men to integrate and cross-relate verbal
> and visual information.
see Sherlock Holmes
>
> A woman may be less able to separate emotion from reason because of
> the way the female brain is organized. The female brain has emotional
> capacities on both sides of the brain, plus there is more information
> exchanged between the two sides of the brain. The emotional side is
> more integrated with the verbal side of the brain.
Again, confusion and distortion. Emotion is a way for ours brains to
remember significant events both good and bad and to make a sharp imprint
on
our minds. Things that happen during childhood are magnified and all out
of
relation to reality, and may effect us as adults ,which is probably a good
argument to bring up children in a somewhat neutral stable environment.
Many
of these childhood "traumas" would not even be noticed by an adult. Since
females are more vulnerable to the effects of brain chemicals that cause
these memories it's easy to see why they have a distorted view of the
environment and the world.
>
> These discernible, measurable differences in behavior have been
> imprinted long before external influences have had a chance to work.
> They reflect a basic difference in the newborn brain which we already
> know about - the superior male efficiency in spatial ability, the
> greater female skill in speech.
Males are superior in all ways.
>
> Boys want to explore areas, spaces
especially the space between a female's legs ;) They're not interested in
exploring the space between a female's ears :o)
and things because their brain bias
> predisposes them to these aspects of the environment. Girls like to
> talk and to listen
Talk, yes. They love the sound of their voice. Listen, no. Females are the
worst listeners and will always disrupt anything they don't like to hear.
because that is what their brains are better
> designed to do.
>
> Even in the Israeli kibbutz, where deliberate attempts have been made
> to play down the differences between boys and girls, and where the
> engineered society proclaims a virtual interchangeability of the
> ***es, it was found that in all age groups, while girls cooperated,
> shared and acted affectionately, boys engaged in more acts of conflict
> such as seizing other children's toys.
>
> The manifestation of masculine behavior in otherwise fully female
> women is a much-debated subject. There are, however, clinical findings
> which point the way to a possible explanation. Most of them concern
> women who have been exposed to an abnormal level of male hormone in
> the womb during the critical period of brain development.
These are called dykes and are an error of foetal development.
Fortunately,
they won't reproduce which is Nature's way of weeding out defects. One
interesting thing about this is while homo***uals make up about 1% of the
population, lesbians are only 1/2 of 1%. This makes sense in the cycle of
reproduction because we always need more females as incubators while 1
man
can easily handle numerous females ***ually.
>
> The pursuit of power is overwhelmingly and universally a male trait.
>
> On the math part of tests, boys do significantly better, and the
> success ratio of boys to girls increases with the level of difficulty.
> On a score of 420+ out of a possible 800, boys beat girls 1.5 : 1. At
> 500+, the ratio is more than 2 : 1. At 600+ it is over 4 : 1. At the
> highest range, of 700+ the ratio is 13 : 1.
And at the top level of 800 it is almost exclusively male. These are the
people who accomplish most things and who gave you this medium you're now
using.
>
> Greater freedom of expression has led to a greater awareness of our
> differences.how long will it be before we revert to type, how long
> before those same magazines are talking of the New Romanticism - 'At
> Last, We Can be Feminine Again' - or running features on the 'Return
> of the Macho'?
>
> Diversity is a biological fact, while equality is a political,
> ethical, and social precept.
>
> Liberation condemns the ***ual double standard - why should ***
> outside of marriage be 'all right' for men, all wrong for women? The
> standards are indeed double, in that an extra-marital affair does mean
> different things, and has a different level of im****tance, for men and
> women. 'It didn't mean anything', mutters the man, when his
> indiscretion is revealed - and it almost certainly didn't.
It probably doesn't mean much with his wife either and he's wondering how
he
ever got trapped into marrying. The word husband is from the old German
and
means "Housebound" sort of like a servant or slave lol While wife just
means like your woman.
He says
> that he loves her just as much as ever, and he probably does. But the
> wife sees his affair as an assault on what is to her most precious -
> intimacy and fidelity.
Sure. Because she knows that she's losing her *** appeal and youth and
won't
be able to trap another good man. The most she can get in middle age is
some
loser while hubby can still get the young 'uns haha
A female thinks of a man as a slave or machine. Imagine having an older
model but well running car and it suddenly breaks down and starts having
problems. You're a female and don't know how to repair it and don't have
the
money to buy a new one. You'd be pissed too lol
If she were to embark on an affair, you can
> bet that is would 'mean' a lot to her. She cannot forgive him; for she
> cannot even understand him. Their brains and their hormones have made
> them strangers to one another.
Females have the childish inclination of projecting their thoughts and
feeling on everything. She believes that everyone thinks just like her and
cannot be objective.
>
> The difference between the attitude and proficiency of men and women
> as parents again reflects those basic differences of the brain. In
> this most intimate of relation****ps, between parent and child, it is
> the mother rather than the father who is more alert to the nuance and
> the non-verbal hint, more naturally responsive to a baby's needs.
During 99% of human history people did not even know that having ***
caused
pregnancy and even after that discovered it they did not know who the
father
was with any certainty. So of course the child was sort of the possession
of
the female and besides, she had to feed it.
Females survived by being nice to men (having ***) and getting things in
return for themselves and child which is why females take to whoring like
a
fish takes to water. It's their Natural role.
>
> The Israeli kibbutz was not designed specifically to abolish the
> Jewish mother. But in these forcing-houses of social engineering,
> girls and boys grew up with virtually interchangeable roles. Children
> were reared communally, and the household duties of cooking and
> laundry were a community, rather than a family responsibility. The
> expectation was that, with the passing of several neutral generations,
> ***ual differentiation would eva****ate, and ***ist stereotyping would
> become a memory as remote as slavery is to the newest generation of
> America's blacks.
> But that is not what happened. Three of four generations later, the
> children of the kibbutz are still clinging to their traditional roles.
> again looking at the experience of the Israeli kibbutzim. Social
> engineers worked hard to iron out classic gender stereotypes at an
> early age: 'All children are dressed in the same work-clothes. there
> is no *** difference in the style of haircut.'
All this is superficial and won't change your genetic predisposition. In
the
not too distant past, boys under a certain age were actually dressed in
dresses and had long hair much like a girl.
http://images.wikia.com/wikiality/images/9/95/Bbrown.jpg
Even so. The boys went
> on to study physics and become engineers, the girls to study sociology
> and become teachers. It is telling proof of what we now know - that
> the minds of men and women are different, that ultimately boys and men
> live in a world of things and space, girls and women in a world of
> people and relation****ps.
They also take the easy less hazardous jobs because a female has to
protect
her child bearing body from injuries. A man who has lost his arms or legs
could still have *** but a crippled female would have a very difficult
time
of it.
>
> Nobody gets paid without performing. Because men try harder more
> often, they will, if not forcibly prevented, succeed more often than
> women in attaining highly-paid positions.
> Little of this is surprising in the light of what we now know about
> the biological springs of aggression and dominance.
>
> Just as there are physical dissimilarities between males and females
> (size, body shape, skeleton, teeth, age of puberty, etc.) there are
> equally dramatic differences in brain functioning.
>
> There is solid and consistent evidence from scientists all over the
> world that a biochemical influence in the womb determines and directs
> the structure and function or our brains. Through the influence of the
> hormones the brain cells 'acquire a "set". highly resistant to change
> after birth'. Male hormone organizes the developing brain into a male
> pattern which leads to male behavior. Absence of the male hormone
> means that the brain persists in a female pattern, resulting in a
> female pattern of behavior. This organization of the brain into a male
> or female neural network is permanent; it can only be modified by
> altering the hormonal milieu of the womb.
Even that would not necessarily change it if there is a structural
difference but merely make the man a homo***ual.
>
> We can hope for an end to the slogans, for slogans do not change
> facts, and an end to the sterile pursuit of artificial equality; an
> abandonment of the arduous and unnatural process of denial and ,
> instead, the enjoyment of our natural selves; the greening of a new
> relation****p between men and women; a celebration of the difference.
>
>
>
> http://www.ihr.org/
http://www.natvan.com
>
> http://www.thebirdman.org
http://www.nsm88.com/
>
> http://wsi.matriots.com/jews.html
|
