Re: Lack Of Trees In Irish And British Countrysides

In article <68johfF2thkejU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
   Hal Ó Mearadhaigh. <homestud@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Someone else wrote:
> > On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:57:04 +1000, "FarmI" <ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 be given>
> > wrote:
> >
> Ireland's population grew to around 8 million. But that had little to do
> with the state of the forests. Disease and over harvesting of trees were
> the main causes of the deforestation. 

As Ireland had no coal, the needs of 8 million people for charcoal and
cooking woulkd certainly damage the forests. Peat was available of course
- but only after the forests had made room for it.

If local attitudes to trees were the same then as now, it is surprising
that any trees survived at all. 

"That tree will knock that wall down - cut it down".

I've heard that sentence so often, it makes me sick.



> Manufacturing, farming, and the
> monies being made out of harvesting the peat bogs were main causes.
> (Alas Bord Na Mona, so much for greed). Blaming the British, (English)
> is merely being paranoid and specious. Britain had more than enough
> forests of her own to build all the ****ps she wished!!

As far as I'm aware Britain got most of it's marine supplies from the
Baltic countries - that trade certainly is mentioned quite frequently in
various history books.

Jochen

-- 

 ------------------------------------ 
 Limavady and the Roe Valley
 http://www.jochenlueg.freeuk.com