Re: Lack Of Trees In Irish And British Countrysides

On Fri, 09 May 2008 22:35:45 +0000 (GMT), jl <jl@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>In article <68johfF2thkejU1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
>   Hal Ó Mearadhaigh. <homestud@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> Someone else wrote:
>> > On Thu, 8 May 2008 16:57:04 +1000, "FarmI" <ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 be given>
>> > wrote:

For those who think that Ireland never had significant forest cover
please see:

www.lhi.org.uk/docs/History_Project_1.pdf

"The first wave of colonisation was by birch, aspen and sallow. About
8 500 BC. pine and hazel spread northwards, replacing the birch, which
became uncommon. The pine colonisation was followed by a wave of oak
and alder. Lime and elm followed this, then holly, ash, beech,
hornbeam and maple."

>> Ireland's population grew to around 8 million. But that had little to
do
>> with the state of the forests. Disease and over harvesting of trees
were
>> the main causes of the deforestation. 

Who was it that was responsible for that overharvesting?

>As Ireland had no coal, the needs of 8 million people for charcoal and
>cooking woulkd certainly damage the forests. Peat was available of course
>- but only after the forests had made room for it.

No, it was always available...

>If local attitudes to trees were the same then as now, it is surprising
>that any trees survived at all. 
>
>"That tree will knock that wall down - cut it down".
>
>I've heard that sentence so often, it makes me sick.
>
>
>> Manufacturing, farming, and the
>> monies being made out of harvesting the peat bogs were main causes.
>> (Alas Bord Na Mona, so much for greed). Blaming the British, (English)
>> is merely being paranoid and specious.

Not if it actually was the British that cut down the Irish forests to
build the fleet that fought the Spanish Armada.

http://www.russellmcmurtrey.com/

"Ireland used to be covered with a lot of oak forest until the peak
British armada years where much of it was cut down for making ****ps."

and, interestingly,

http://www.millersville.edu/~columbus/papers/nucci.html

"The Queen gave Ralegh a massive estate in Ireland. He later plundered
this Irish land for its forests in order to finance one of his
expeditions."

"He exploited the natural resources of Irish forestry to fund his
expedition and targeted religious dissidents for settlement in English
outposts."

>> Britain had more than enough
>> forests of her own to build all the ****ps she wished!!

Maybe so / maybe not but the ruling class of Britain still cut down
the trees of Ireland.

>As far as I'm aware Britain got most of it's marine supplies from the
>Baltic countries

What? There were substantial Oak forests in Latvia?

For the ****ps that fought the Spanish Armada? 

Wouldn't it have been easier and cheaper to have felled the trees in
nearby Ireland?

> - that trade certainly is mentioned quite frequently in
>various history books.

Which ones precisely?

Nik

----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----