Re: Lack Of Trees In Irish And British Countrysides

"Someone else" <republican_remove_spam_@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message > On 
Sat, 10 May 2008, "FarmI" <ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 be given> wrote:
>>"Someone else" > wrote in message
> >>Thu, , "FarmI" <ask@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 be given> wrote:
>>>>"Way Back Jack" <retired@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>>>>
>>>>> TV do***entaries and travelogues reveal a lot of lush "green" in
those
>>>>> countrysides but a relative scarcity of trees.  Is it climate?  Too
>>>>> windy in Ireland?  Sheep and/or other livestock?
>>
>>(snip) Ireland suffered from
>>>>ice coverage during the Ice Ages so any trees there had to come back
as
>>>>pioneer species.
>>>>
>>>>Large numbers of people, 'modern farming' and trees don't go together.

>>>> >>>>As the population grew the trees would have had to go,
>>>> or in some instances,
>>>>'modern farming' methods were the cause of clearance too.  Ireland's
>>>>population exploded after the introduction of the potato and you can't
>>>>grow spuds in forests so even if there had been a desire to grow more 
>>>> >>>>trees, there would have been a strong disincentive to do so.
>
> That is true.

I know and therefore wonder why you can now read what I wrote originally
and 
have no trouble with it, but couldn't do so the first time you read it.

>>> Ireland had extensive forest cover well prior to the arrival of
>>> potatoes in Europe...
>>
>>Yes it did have more trees but even today Ireland has only 16.8% of land
>>that is arable.  I don't know what the figure is for Ulster, but think
it
>>would be higher.
>
> There is a reason why Cromwell's men gave the inhabitants of Ulster
> the choice "To hell or Connaught" that being that the land of Ulster
> was preferable to the land of Connaught for farming...and underlies
> the essentially economic reasons rather than theological ones for the
> Irish conflict.

Indeed.

>>>...so you're telling me that in the roughly 150 years between the
arrival 
>>>of the potato in
>>> western Europe, including Ireland, from South America, and the Potato
>>> Famine of the 1840s that Ireland's population grew so much that it had
>>> also become deforested?
>>
>>Do read for comprehension.  You clearly did not understand what I wrote.
>
> I've addressed this elsewhere in this post.

You didn't.

>>In addition, some of your facts are simply wrong.  The potato was 
>>introduced
>>into Ireland by about 1600
>
> Right...after the 1588 Battle with the Spanish Armada...
>
>> so by the time the first cases of potato blight
>>were seen in 1816, so 200 years had passed not 150.  The famine of 
>>1845-1851
>>was the worst but not the only famine.
>
> Did I claim it was?
>
> Nah.

Indeed you didn't claim that, but attempting to ****ft the goal posts
doesn't 
invalidate my point.  You claimed that it was 150 years between the
arrival 
of the potato and the 1840s famine.  That is not correct.

>>Ireland population doubled at the end of the 18th century in about a
40-50
>>year period till it hit 8 million.
>
> So you're telling me that the population of Ireland in 1750 was 4
> million people despite the fact that there were no censuses of the
> entire population of Ireland until 1821?
>
> http://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/help/history.html
> http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/findingData/snDescription.asp?sn=3542

Do try rereading what I wrote and do try to understand what the words mean

when linked together.  I try to be quite precise in what I write and your 
interpretation of what I wrote is not what I wrote.

Also the existence of a census is not the only way that population growth
is 
*****sed.  If you do not know about the growth of the Irish population in 
the latter half of the 18th century then I suggest you use google.

>> That increase did not come from grain.
>
> I think that you're going to have to revise what you've said above.

Not on the basis of anything you have written.

>>Ireland's population today is now just over 4 million.
>
> No, Ireland's population is more like 6 million...remember to compare
> apples with apples and include the population of what is now known as
> 'Northern Ireland' in your figures because the figures for the census
> of 1821 included all 32 counties...

Fair point and I stand corrected.

>>> Why do you neglect to mention the impact on farm owner****p patterns
>>> incurred by the Penal Laws?
>>>
>>> http://local.law.umn.edu/irishlaw/land.html
>>
>>You're right I didn't mention them and that was quite deliberate.
>
> Really you should have

No, really I shouldn't have.  I was aware that some Irish Nationalist
would 
come out of the woodwork at some stage and rave on about irrelevancies. 
They always do. And you did.

>>Perhaps you could knock that chip off your shoulder and explain how to 
>>grow potatoes
>>in a forest to feed a rapidly growing population?
>
> Admittedly difficult but given that the naval battle between the
> English and the Spanish occurred in 1588 was before the potato was
> introduced to Ireland, as you claim above, 1600 and the trees had
> already been largely cut down to build the ****ps that fought the
> Spanish Armada in the name of the Elizabeth I the point is beside the
> point...the trees were already gone...

If you have managed to get to this conclusion, you must finally begin to
see 
my original point.  I will remind you that my original point and which 
seemed to result in your posting of irrelevancies.  My point was: "you
can't 
grow spuds in forests so even if there had been a desire to grow more
trees, 
there would have been a strong disincentive to do so."

>>  Or on the Burren or a bog or some of the other non arable land?
>
> Have you yourself ever actually been to the Burren?

Another irrelevancy?

>>> Also you neglect to mention that the English desire to build a fleet
>>> of war****ps to fight the Spanish Armada and where they obtained the
>>> timber to do so...
>>>
>>> You may (or may not) know a lot about Botany but you don't know much
>>> about the natural and human history of Ireland.
>
> Perhaps I should say, don't seem to know much, in particular about the
> impact of the penal laws and their long reaching historical
> consequences...some of which are still in place right now...in the
> form of inherited privilege...

You shouldn't say that because to do so based on a total lack of evidence 
based on anything I have so far posted in this thread makes you sound even

less logical and unable to read for comprehension than you have to this 
point.

>>And you appear to have reading difficulties
>
> The lecturers at my University disagree with you.

Well given the paucity of skills I've seen amongst recent graduates, that 
doesn't surprise me.  It saddens me that Lecturers and Tutors seem
prepared 
to accept intellecual sloth and sloppy thinking from their students, but
it 
doesn't surprise me.

>>so I will forgive your inability to draw a logical conclusion
>
> Please indicate, using formal logic where it is that I make an invalid
> inference.

No. We will do the reverse.  YOU indicate using formal logic how you
reached 
the conclusion that:
"You may (or may not) know a lot about Botany but you don't know much
about the natural and human history of Ireland."

>> based on your misunderstanding of what I wrote
>>or didn't write.
>
> Of course a logically valid inference can be drawn from an incorrect
> assumption/belief but it remains for you to demonstrate that I have
> done this. I await with interest.

And you can continue to wait.  You drew a conclusion based on an incorrect

understanding of what I wrote therefore it is up to you to do the work. 
Not 
me.  I am not your mother or one of your lecturers.

>>I know when my ancestors left Ireland, I also know why they left.
>
> Ok, fair enough but does that have anything at all directly to do with
> the deforestation of Ireland? Or the introduction and subsequent
> dependence of the Irish Catholic population on the potato?

No it doesn't but then I never claimed that it did.  I wrote that comment
in 
response to your conclusion that I knew nothing about the natural or human

history of Ireland.

You could not logically reach such a conclusion based on the scarce 
information I presented in my initial post in this thread.

>>  You know nothing about what I know about Ireland
>
> Why then did you not refer to the impact of the Penal laws regards
> inheritance?

Because I KNOW how it brings rabid, raving nutters out of the woodwork.
And 
you did come.

>> nor it seems about the impact of the
>>potato on population growth of Ireland or indeed when the famines
occurred
>
> Claiming to know the extent of my knowledge is just silly...especially
> considering that you've underestimated it.

LOL.  And I'll bet you don't appreciate the irony of that statement!  A
nice 
case of pot, kettle, black.

The infestations of the
> fungus Phytophthora infestans occurred several times in the 1840's
> with the consequences being particularly dire in 1848-49 given that
> there had already been several years of crop failure...
>
>> or how long the Irish had been growing potatoes.
>
> Do feel free to make up **** to suit your prejudices eh?

So far the prejudices in this thread have been displayed by you in truck 
loads.

I was not the one to introduce them and very deliberately avoided doing
so. 
YOU were the one to introduce them and you have continued to do so.

I'm sure you'll stop sounding like an undergraduate at some stage. 
Perhaps 
when you become an adult.