Re: Memristor

On May 10, 1:49 pm, prizraka <ivaylo.iva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> ...
>
> > Za Stoil, Ivaylo, i Chorbi:
>
> > "in 1971 Leon Chua reasoned from symmetry arguments that there should
> > be a fourth fundamental element, which he called a memristor..."
>
> Tova e obsolyutno sqshtoto kato napisanoto ot men.
>
>
>
> > =C2=EC=E5=F1=F2=EE =E4=E0 =EC=E8 =F2=E2=FA=F0=E4=E8=F2=E5, =F7=E5
=F3=F0=
=E0=E2=ED=E5=ED=E8=FF=F2=E0 =ED=FF=EC=E0=EB=E8 =ED=E8=F9=EE =EE=E1=F9=EE,
=
=EF=EE-=E4=EE=E1=F0=E5 =F1=E8
> > =EE=E1=FF=F1=ED=E5=F2=E5
=F2=EE=E2=E0:http://shell.msen.com/~lwp/memrist=
or.doc
>
> Da, memristora mozhe da bqde opisan s uravnieniya. Tova nyamam
> absolyutno nikakvo otnoshenie po nashata diskusiya.

Pak se inatish. Eto tova ima i e cherno na bjalo napisano:

"Chua deduced the existence of memristors from the mathematical
relation****ps between the circuit elements. ... Chua
proposed the memristor purely for the mathematical aesthetics of it,
as a class of circuit element based on a relation****p between charge
and flux."
Veche go tzitirah v predishna prashtulka, no ti si mnogo goljam inat-
dzhanabet!