Re: Memristor

On Sat, 10 May 2008 14:07:58 -0700, ivanovad wrote:

> On May 10, 1:49 pm, prizraka <ivaylo.iva...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> ...

>> > Za Stoil, Ivaylo, i Chorbi:

>> > "in 1971 Leon Chua reasoned from symmetry arguments that there should
>> > be a fourth fundamental element, which he called a memristor..."

>> Tova e obsolyutno sqshtoto kato napisanoto ot men.

>> > Âìåñòî äà ìè òâúðäèòå, ÷å óðàâíåíèÿòà
íÿìàëè íèùî îáùî, ïî-äîáðå ñè
>> > îáÿñíåòå òîâà:http://shell.msen.com/~lwp/memristor.doc

>> Da, memristora mozhe da bqde opisan s uravnieniya. Tova nyamam
>> absolyutno nikakvo otnoshenie po nashata diskusiya.

> Pak se inatish. Eto tova ima i e cherno na bjalo napisano:

> "Chua deduced the existence of memristors from the mathematical
> relation****ps between the circuit elements. ... Chua proposed the
> memristor purely for the mathematical aesthetics of it, as a class of
> circuit element based on a relation****p between charge and flux."
> Veche go tzitirah v predishna prashtulka, no ti si mnogo goljam inat-
> dzhanabet!

по-скоро ти проверява реакциите :о)

нали сам го беше казал преди няколко
пращулки -- че вече знае как да 
индуцира първосигнални реакции в нас :о)

-- 
the lamer's team honourable member
----------------------------------
Nick Angelow