Dear All,
Ko Aung San was a Tatmadaw General, Ko Aung San was a civilian
politician, himself .he was a Tatmadaw man leading Myanmar politic.
True, Bogyoke Aung San fought against British, he fought against the
Japanese. But as a matter of fact together with Bogyoke Aung San, Bo
Ne Win fought against the British, fought against the Japanese . But
Bo Ne Win also fought, against the Communists, fought against the
Kayin ( KNDO ), fought against multi coloured insurgencies . not to
forget he fought against KMT white Chinese. As a matter of fact Bo Ne
Win fought enemies which Ko Aung San never dreamed of.
Unfortunately or facts of politic, civilian politicians including U Nu
may have had created many more insurgents while trying to create or to
preserve Union of Myanmar as one nation for all people as one. But
Burma ( Myanmar) was never like this. Governments of Union of Burma
managed to keep insurgents at bays. That was because Myanmar Tatmadaw
was united and strong.
Let us look at the Tatmadaw a bit. It was formed by patriotic
politicians in accord with a natural objectives of liberation of
subjugation. It was chronicled that Tatmadaw was conceived of natural
politic as it was formed with natural politician who became members of
Tatmadaw. Ko Aung S an and some of his comrades were students turned
to politicians and they formed themselves a Tatmadaw. After the
independence some carried on and stayed in Tatmadaw, some gone into
business, some gone into politic. But they all were soldiers from
Myanma Tatmadaw.
Before Ma Su Kyi was born, while her father was still very much alive
there were wicked schemes to break up the Tatmadaw ( BIA , BDA ,
etc.) There were those who wanted continued colonial rule in our
country , lackeys of colonialists and national traitors as we have
here in Myanmar today. They have a strong dislike of united strength
of Tatmadaw and people. Their ill attempts that have been made from
the time of fascism , colonialism.
Being jealous of the Tatmadaw striving in all aspects for the
country's transition into peaceful , modern and developed democratic
one, they who oppose SPDC, relying on external elements with negative
views are still attempting to break up or weaken the strength of
Tatmadaw. With intent to grab the State Power with the belief that
they will realise their aim only if the Tatmadaw breaks up.
If Ma Su Kyi does not want to acknowledge what Tatmadaw is doing, May
be because she saw U Ne Win was better than her own father. if she
doesn't want to recognised what the Tatmadaw led by U Ne Win was doing
that is her own problem. But the people also see what she is doing,
the people are also taking notes of what Ma Su Kyi is doing. The
people know what is black and what is white.
She had been attacking U Ne Win from left and right. I could find no
reason why she did that but a pure jealousy against U Ne Win, I
think. Or her deliberate attempts to mislead the people , to attract
the people , to give a last push to the already falling old soldier to
fade away .
Ma Su Kyi said, her attacks were nothing personnel. That may be true
to a certain extant , but her words against U Ne Win showed her hatred
for him. Was it her hatred or was it U Tin Oo's hatred for U Ne Win.
The whole of Burma knew, the whole of Tatmadaw knew how jealous, U Tin
Oo or his wife are against U Ne Win and his wife Daw Khin MayThan.
That is another story.
Ma Su Kyi was away from Burma most of the time. Hatred cannot be from
her heart, it must be from U Tin Oo, her mentor who was feeding her
with all the information. Ma Su Kyi was being used by U Tin Oo,
thoroughly blinded by U Tin Oo and those around her.
There is nothing unjust to glorify Tatmadaw. Crisis after crisis in
Myanmar in Myanmnar Tatmadaw led by Gen Ne Win had to take
responsibility, and tok care of Union of Myanmar. And Ma Su Kyi tried
to tell the people U Ne Win himself was the responsible or a burden
himself.
It became too much, one critic who respected Ma Su Kyi deeply could
not restrain himself from rebuking her;
" The army built up by your father exited in the past. It no longer
exits today. As army can never its place itself above an organization
elected by the people . That is something we must fight against If we
don't , then it will be very dangerous for our country If anyone is
going to get involved in politic in Burma, they should understand
clearly about the Burma Army. If not they will not be able to be
either a leader or a follower."
Ma Su Kyi did not know what that meant. " Rebuke " is a lovely word,
cleverly used. The translator did not use the word, " scold " which
may down grade Ma Su Kyi, Whatever it was, the fact is U Chit Khaing
tried to calm her down ,he did not try to put her down or down grade
her.
My father , my father, Aung San, Aung San that was all she was
saying. Bo Ne Win also have had many sons and daughters Ma Su Kyi must
know. They have no God fathers neither. No Gore Booth nor Moreland,
no Anna Elliot not John O' Kerr.
Aung San is familiar to all people in Myanmar, to all who are
connected with Myanmar. But she was saying as if there were no other
national leaders who paid their lives for Myanmar's independence
together with her father Aung San who were dead or still alive , as if
there were no other Myanmars, who admired and honoured Aung San but
her. She had no respect for somebody else's fathers but only for her
father. As if they were there as if they were nothing.
For me , Ma Su Kyi just woke up from the wrong side of the bed. She
was having nightmare or at least she was sleep walking..
Including her private secretary Ma Thein Gi, and many who went to
prison because of her, suggested her that her approaches were not
right. After she was released Ma Thein Gi wrote in the Asiaweek about
her experience with Ma Su Kyi, how she tried to calm Ma SU Kyi down
and why she had to leave Ma Su Kyi. Many other young NLD members who
criticised Ma Su Kyi were expelled from the party. And Ma Su Kyi
called U Ne Win and Gen Saw Maung, dictators, their method were
fascism.
Ma Su Kyi said on her Irrawaddy tour, " it is shameful for anyone to
be happy when most of the people in the country are suffering. If
anyone can live like that then they have no heart. Anyone who only
cares about themselves and their own family and immediate surrounding
is not a real human being" .
Those were her own words. If what she said were true, she should ask
her self what was she also doing, where was she when the whole
country was suffering?
Where was Ma Su Kyi when the Communists and Kayins (KNDO) had taken
some parts of Burma (Myanmar ? I know what she will say, she was only
5 years old. She could not do anything. She left Yangon in 1960
together with her mother to India. That time she was a young girl
about 15 years. And after that did she ever offered her services to
the nation of Myanmar and to the people of Myanmar while other young
women of Myanmars were already serving the nation and serving the
people. Where was Ma Su Kyi all these time, who was she serving?
She denied she did not call for economic sanctions, but she admits
that she sup****ts the sanction.She will continue doing that until such
time. In the mean time the people of Myanmar are suffering. She said
they are not. Ma Su Kyi may not be suffering, because of economic
sanctions, so why should she care , she never care for anyone in her
life, but herself.
The question is , hasn't she got a heart, a mother's heart, is she not
a human ? She is the only one who can answer to these questions.
Since 1948 all walks of life, every Tom, Dick and Harry in Myanmar
went to Azarnigone to pay their respect to Bogyoke Aung San and other
leaders to honour them. That is something like a ritual in Myanmar.
Government sponsored or state function. Azarni Nay is a holiday in
Myanmar.
How many times on her own she visited her father tomb, at any other
time?
On the 19 July 1989, Martyre's Day, Ma Su Kyi said " General Aung San
was a national leader who tries to give everyone their freedom and
rights. Therefore people ought to be allowed freedom honouring him.
However the people have been intimidated by the SLORC, in all kinds of
ways. This is clearly a direct contradiction of Aung San's method. Out
of respect and love for General Aung San we must be able to boycott
the Martyrs' Day organised by the SLORC We must stay in our own house
and let the world know that we are the prisoners in our own country."
Ma Su Kyi did not want the people to pay their respect to Ko Aung San,
she did not want people to honour Ko Aung San. She told the people not
to attend the Martyrs' Day, she told them to stay indoors and she said
to let the world know that they are the prisoners in their own
country.
You locked yourself in and you are the who was shouting for help
saying you are locked in. Oh, Ma Su Kyi, wasn't other any other
alternative?
Joan or Arc, she confronts everything and every one believing God was
with her. In the end she was torched to death. Some people might argue
that Ma Su Kyi case is different. Joan was against the English, Ma Su
Kyi is not against English not even against British. In a sense
French sacrificed Joan to the English to get what they want as Jesus
was.
By the way, did Ma Su Kyi know, that Mausoleum (Azarni Beik Mhan ) was
once blown up by the Koreans in an attempt to assassinate other
Koreans. Since then in and out of that place was restricted. I wonder
where she was at the time.
Myanmar Buddhists follow the teaching of Buddha , they don't wor****p
the dead or the Zombis. Ko Aung San was Ma Su Kyi's father, the father
she hardly know. I can understand her feeling
Ma Su Kyi was lucky in a way, when Myanmars were queuing for rice,
cooking oil, salt, chilly and onion , she was not among the people.
She was one of those upper crust, as the daughter of General Aung
San. She did not need to stand in the queue. Even now she is well
look after by the minders. Having a good life, that she never had in
England, while other Myanmar peoples are suffering in many ways. She
may know about suffering in theories but I bet she never had any
experienced on suffering in her life.
About the "FASCISM" Bogyoke Aung San and thirty comrades were trained
by the imperial Japanese army. Did they not know the Japanese were
the fascists?
To be honest and to be sincere. We do not know very much about Bogyoke
Aung San , because he was short lived. We did not know as much as we
know about Ma Su Kyi who happened to be his daughter. When Bogyoke
Aung San was accused of killing a man, though it was as a necessity,
it must be that fascism that Japanese drove into his mind. Ma Su Kyi
is the daughter of Bogyoke Aung San. All armies in the world and army
men or women are fascists in one way or the other. The whole world is
seeing them today. That they are not behaving like human.
Ma Su Kyi is the daughter of a fascist trained Ko Aung San ? She is
the daughter of a leftist named Ko Aung San . Could she be a fascist
or could she be a leftist? She could be anything. She is the only one
who can answer these questions.
Ma Su Kyi welcomed anybody into her party as long as they carry a
banner,
" DEMOCRACY ", irrespective of whether the forces consist of ex
communists, ex-pro-communists, ex-union party members, ex-BSPP ,
members or ex -army officers .What she did not mentioned were ex-
convicts , ex- Buddhist monks including fakes and bogus monks,
criminal, thieves, robbers and looters and rapists., absconders, and
fugitives .
does Ma Su Kyi not realised what she was doing, what she was saying?
SPDC is heading for democracy , her policies and SPDC's are nothing
much difference. Yet she cannot join hands with SPDC, but she will
join hands with those democratic forces irrespective of whatever they
are, as long as they acknowledge and recognise her as the BIG
BOSS..
In the beginning there were 104 different parties, under the umbrella
of NLD, later 42 , now , nobody knows. Ma Su Kyi is the single
representative of all
parties authorised to talk to SLORC/SPDC, to discuss with SLORC/SPDC,
NLDdecided since then.
What will Ma Su Kyi say the US Army at Guantanamo Bay. The way they
treated the so called terrorists. Those who are being detained,
without any charges. What will Ma Su Kyi say about US Army in Vietnum,
Laos, Cambodia, Afghanistan and Iraq. What will she call them?
Will she say those are not her business, or will she say "the whites
have the rights".
If all go well , referendum in May, elections in 2010. All people of
Myanmar, must have their conscience clear. there is nothing to
confused. They should know about themselves, they should know about
their people, they should know about their country. They should do
what their first instinct tell them to do.
Whatever Sr. Gen Than Shwe and SPDC do, is not right for some.
Whatever Ma Su Kyi and NLD do is not right for the others as well .
The best is lets have the referendum in May , elections in 2010 and
elect those who is neither Sr.Gen Than Sahe nor Ma Su Kyi. Who we
think can do better for Myanmar . Will that be enough ?
I don't think so. We are talking about FREE and FAIR elections. What
do we mean by FREE and FAIR? Do we understand what FREE and FAIR
are? What is FREE and what is FAIR?.
No matter how FREE and FAIR, if the opposition does not win somebody
will say it was not FREE and FAIR.
No matter how FREE and FAIR , If NUP or those who were leaning towards
SPDC wins, they still will say it was not FREE and FAIR.
We are seeing in some countries before the result came out opposition
is announcing the victory, claiming the victory. Their sup****ters
including foreign media announcing the victory of their puppets.
That was what happened in 1990 in Myanmar. Long before the polls were
closed foreign media BBC, VOA announcing NLD victory, not to mentioned
that they were campaigning for Ma Su Kyi's NLD, especially BBC. They
were campaigning against NUP and others. How FREE and FAIR can it be?
NLD complaint for not getting fair share of the air time in BBS or in
local papers. Did they really need that after all the who world was
campaigning for them on behalf of them. VOA, BBC were braining wa****ng
the people of Myanmar FREELY.
Foreign observers , what is the different , they are the sup****ters of
the opposition. Or they don't know what Myanmars are doing, These
foreigner looking at Myanmar with their standardised eyes and minds
They see everything different when they look at Myanmar. Will they be
FREE and FAIR to judge Myanmar, to give their judgement or comments on
Myanmar?
For example weapon inspector Hans Blix & UNSG Koffi Annan, what could
they do to have FREE and FAIR in the world?
Do you consider yourself as a FREE and FAIR person? Be honest to
yourself, because that will be Paya Kyite - Nat Kyite - Luu Kyite.
That is all it counts.
Mogyothwar.
|
