My Dear James,
Thank you for replying to my artical under the headline of " They must
not be allowed to exist."
Sorry to know that you thought I was one of NLD or opposition
sympathizer. I am not after I learned about the opposition I realise
that I can never be on their side. Because they are the rebels without
a cause. That the way I ee them.
I=92ve never been. an opposition to BSPP yes But I am not even a
sup****ter of SPDC. But after I compared the opposition and the SPDC ,
I see the SPDC's points, I see things from their angle. Because I am
Bamar I am one of the Myanmars. Who is living in this side of the
world and having a good look at the world on its political economical
and social matters. And learning. In my life I have been lived under
three wo foreign occupations ( Brits , Japs Brits. . I know what I am
talking about.
I also know how the foreeign governments influence on the Burmese
opposition,.most of them are only kids, how they are brain wa****ng
them I see them with my own eyec, nobody has to tell me anything. I
happened to know what the so called Burmese opposition are made of.
There are many Myanmars who took the names from the Holy Bible, the
names the twelve disciples, but they never came close to become
disciple. Some of them even took their names from the grave stones in
the cemeteries Because they are free., you don=92t have to pay a
penny. Having said that I don=92t mean, it is you. James.
As your name happens to be James, your view on SPDC and it=92s actions
or it=92s performance may not be to your taste., I am sure. I can also
understand that as a person living on this side of the world for so
long. It is true that SPDC is an unelected military government. But
it had to take over under cir***stances. You may or may not accept it
but you should not forget that we are talking about Burma. .
Burma is not a peaceful nation yet, its never been Even during
British occupation or Japanese occupation Burma had no piece.
Fighting and troubles are the middle names of Burma.
Military take over was a necessity, in 1962 or in 1988. They had to
stay longer then everybody expected for some good reasons. Burma=92s
military is involved in its own country, in its own country=91s affairs
and it=91s people affairs, .to take care of the nation and its people.,
to defend and protect the nation and its people. They are professional
soldiers but not mercenaries. It sides with nobody. So it is also
understandable that nobody is on their side either. But it has to do
what need to be done. Including to take over .the powers. .
Every where, where the military is involved, rightly or wrongly some
undesirable thing do happen. We are seeing everywhere in the world.
You may or may not accept it. You are entitle to your own opinion.
Opinions are opinions and realities are realities. Sometimes they
reflect some times they don=92t
In Afghanistan or in Iraq , these military forces , or in my own words
the occupational forces will be there as long as necessary as I
understand. In Afghanistan , in Iraq, in Cuba or in Japan or even in
Germany., God know where else. No matter what they say their reasons
are, to justify their actions. These are very common and very
familiar things.
If you go back to 1962 or 1988, digest the events. Or even back to
1948 Burma was a fragile country from a start. You will see the
military took over was necessary because of cir***stances, to make
Burma as one nation and all Myanmars as one people. I would not be
surprise if toy would not accept. Whether you accept or not is
another matter.
What will you say about those who took over Iraq? Who took over
Afghanistan.? They are all under cir***stances whether I like it or
not, they have there own reasons if not the excuses.
If you even compare these military involvements, you will only see
what you want to see and you will only accept what you want to accept.
Every one will say anything to justify their actions. But in the case
of Burma it is in the interest of the nation , it is in the interest
of the people of Myanmar. .
If these militaries involvement in Afghanistan and Iraq also be said
that they are , nothing more then a bunch of criminals having hijacked
other nations against their will by brute military force. Not to
mention Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia in the past.
Military government in Burma was a necessity if you can only
understand the real situation. in Burma.
I just wonder what they will do if U.S A. or U.K were in Burma=92s
position.
Through books I know what British had done to the Burmese after they
took over in 1885. Through book s I happened to know what the white
men did to the Red Skins.
At the moment U.K may have Scotland, and Wales and Northern Ireland
with separate parliaments In the United States, there are separate
states but there is no Apache State, Comanche State , Dakota State.
Black Foot State or Crow State etc. etc. Not to forget the Sioux
nation is a thing of the past. In U.S A. If you can understand what I
am saying. If you only know what I am referring to., If you only know
the making of United States of America, you would not be saying such
rubbish.
You may not like SPDC as a government to exit, but there you are. You
don=92t like SPDC because they as a Tatmadaw, is united, can not be
bullied, cannot be undermine, cannot be influence by any outsiders of
insiders, forget about manipulating them. They are nobody=92s puppets.
That is why you don=92t llike them.
Ma Su Kyi had the same idea, she could not stand to see military
though her father realised that only the military man c an liberate
Burma and protect and defend Burma . So he transformed himself as one
of the military man. At least he took the sj=3Dkin of military and cover
himself.
If Tatmadaw (military) does not exited in Burma, Burma will never
exited. It was the Tatmadaw that create Burma. It was the Tatmadaw
which freed Burma, which liberated Burma from foreign occupation and
from the lickers of the Brits..
Many people tries to belittled Myanma Tatmadaw. Many people spit on
Myanmar Tatmadaw Many people launched smear campaign against Myanma
Tatmadaw , including Ma Su Kyi the Ingalate Mayar. . .
To make you clear, when I was saying "These criminals must not be
allowed to exist." I was referring to all the destructionists who are
against Myanmar and Myanma Tatmadaw including Ma Su Kyi. . She should
have gone into prison like Nelson Mandela did or she should be wasted
long ago. .
I blamed SPDC only for one thing, for being merciful towards these
criminals. For allowing these criminals to prolong their lives. For
allowing these criminals to continue to disrupt the lives of all other
people. They should be executed in suitable way cheapest, cost
effective way. Drown them in the river Irrawaddy or in the nearest
ponds and lakes . .
There are death penalties in other countries, which are advocating
democracy and human rights. There are death penalties in Communists
countries . There are death penalties in non-democratic or non-
communist countries where there is no democratically elected
government.
It=92s a pity, there is no death penalty in Burma. If there is, this
penalty is not carried out. Nobody in Burma is in waiting to be
executed.
For your information. Than Shwe is weak, he is soft very soft. he is
gentle., he is merciful As I see these as his weakness, he had to
stretch his arms so long. If I were in his place, with Tatmadaw behind
me. All things could be solved since 1993. I will take care of the
Burmese oppositions like the way George W Bush and Tony Blair take
care of Iraq and Afghanistan .
It is a pity a great pity I am not in Burma . it=92s a pity a great pity
that I am not ruling/governing Burma. It would be great if I could
visit to United States of America to study and learn how they tortured
their criminals or prisoners of conscience naming as terrorists and
how they execute the criminals , by gas, by electricity or any other
way.
If a leader or a military institution is guilty of defending and
protecting his nation and his people from enemies within or enemies
outside. Then all of them whoever they are, from which ever country
they are, they should all be hanged if he/she is civilian, should be
shot if he/she is military person.
By the way you can say Buddha is not valid, Christ is not valid,
Mohammed is not valid.. You can say anything you like valid or not,
it is on the tip of your tongue only. The one who is not valid is the
one and only Ma Su Kyi
1990 elections or not , if there is no valid constitution to govern
the nation, then the present ruling government or the provisional
government ,must provide one and hold new elections. If British had
aright to draw up South Africa=92s constitution or its influence in
Burma =91s constitution,. Then Myanma Tatmadaw as a present ruling
government or the provisional government or a Tatmadaw of the nation
must provide a necessary constitution and to hold free and fair
elections., if those are the right words.
Have you seen or hear anybody who do not lies. George W Bush, Tony
Blair. Or even ma Su Kyi, she said she did not call for economic
sanctions, but just sup****ting it. Who is the liar, you want to
say.?
An election will be free and fair., only when those who mine their own
business and let others mind their own business as well.
Election will never be free and fair when some people making other
peoples=92 business as their own business.
In simple words, Myanmar should be left alone to the people of
Myanmar. They are no kindergarten children for some body to patronised
them. .Let them solve their own problems by their own. That is free
and fair for a start.
Whatever right or wrong is not for you to judge. The history will make
the judgement.
Did you believe what the white men did to the Red Skin or what the
white men did to the Aborigines in Australia were right.
You declared the referendum invalid in advance because you are afraid
and you know it will be approved by the people. Who cares what ever
you declared? Foreign media declared it in advance the referendum is
invalid. Are you or are they GODs? As long as they don=92t have their
man or the woman on the seat they will be saying that. Its crystal
clear and obvious.
You try your best to influence the people of Myanmar and you want free
and fair? I hope you know the meaning of these two words FREE and
FAIR? Before the referendum was started , nobody know when the
elections be. , before they are even begins. You are announcing the
result, already saying they are rigged. Mine oh mine what is the world
coming to.
If there is somebody who is rigging the referendum or the elections
which nobody know when they will be, then that somebody must be
nobody else but you. Who knows the tricks of rigging.
These are very familiar old songs James, its time for you to sing
another new song Especially when you want free and fair and when you
are looking for free and fair.
If you come up with free and fair comments on SPDC, I promise you
that, I will match up with you.to be free and fair on the
opposition. .
To conclude this talk, James , you know very well whom I was
referring to, what I was talking about In other words , those who
tries to disintegrate the nation, those who tries to disintegrate the
unity of the people , those who ties to disrupt the perpetuation of
sovereignty., those who relied on foreign elements under the influence
of foreign power.
As Myanmar was unfortunately under two foreign powers before for over
a century. And through that experience, right or wrong , I rather be
under my own rulers then under those foreign rulers. If you are a
Bamar or a Myanmar you will understand.
Regards,
Mogyothwar.
|
