Re: Overpopulation and Burma cyclone

On May 9, 12:01 pm, Enough Already <enough_alre...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Burma has close to 48 million people in an area slightly smaller than
> Texas (USA). As the population grows (mindlessly, like everywhere),
> more trees are lost. Mangroves used to form a coastal buffer against
> extreme storm surges, but 3/4ths of them have been cleared for shrimp
> and rice farming since the 1920s.
Seehttp://www.iht.com/articles/2008/05/09/asia/mangrove.php
>
> This is similar to what happened with hurricane Katrina. Too many
> barrier wetlands have been filled in for development (a.k.a.
> population growth), making them unable to absorb storm surges as they
> naturally would.

The demonkrap parasites can move anytime.
The poor ignorant people of Burma can not move, you pathetic ****tard.
Tough ****.

> Florida also suffers from this condition. Record
> storms reveal the idiocy of destroying nature in the name of "economic
> growth."

Nature isn't being destroyed, lunatic.
"Record storms" are not caused by condos, lunatic.

> A parallel reason we're seeing larger death tolls is that more people
> are living in disaster-prone areas.

They live there because of poverty, retard.
Prosperity would give them options.

>  Population growth creates a
> vicious cycle of less buffer protection and more people at the mercy
> of the elements.

Prosperity would give them options.
Hate it, don't ya?

> Until it becomes politically correct to promote birth control vs.
> "meeting the needs of a growing population," mindless growth will
> continue until the 11th hour. Actually, the 11th hour has long been
> upon us, but growthism wipes out all reason.

So, lunatic, you got nothing as usual.