Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Burma > Re: U.N. 'furio...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 47 of 155 Topic 10290 of 10783
 Post > Topic >>

Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'

by "Sir Dalai" <Sir Dalai@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 10, 2008 at 12:31 PM

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_00E1_01C8B299.B86C39E0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

  <bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message =
news:d5cc774f-1656-4cd5-a82c-6cf09d2052c3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  On May 9, 3:49 pm, PaPaPeng <PaPaP...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
  > On Fri, 9 May 2008 14:47:02 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  > >What if only one grain of rice reaches the people? You're saying =
that
  > >no matter how shameless and horrible the junta is, we should bend =
over
  > >backwards to comply with their edicts, even if it means more people
  > >will die. Sovereignty is im****tant but in so is saving lives, =
arguably
  > >moreso in this case. It's too bad the junta is in charge. They =
don't
  > >deserve to be.
  >
  > This is a human disaster not a morality play. There is no place for
  > good and evil battles. Do what is possible first and that is to get
  > drinking water food and shelter, medical supplies to the disaster
  > site. Who gets the supplies is irrelevant at this moment. The
  > im****tant thing is to get the stuff there on the ground. Then argue
  > about the fairness and the morality of allocation.=20

  OK, but if there is a way to put pressure on the junta not to behave
  as they have been behaving, and get more aid to the people and have
  more trained personnel involved, it would save lives. Having trained
  professionals involved could make a world of difference.

  > If the regime is stupid enough to hoard the supplies only for itself
  > then the anger of the people will have a unstoppable basis to topple
  > the regime with. By then their lives are already written off and =
dying
  > with a bullet is better than their families and themselves slowly
  > starving to death. The ordinary army ranks will certain not sup****t
  > a regime that immoral for their own families will also die in the
  > disaster.

  You might be right. Though the junta might see to it that the military
  and their families are well-fed, even if the rest of the people are
  not. If I were a murderous dictator mainly interested in keeping power
  that's what I might do. Of course, if foreign aid workers were present
  it would be much harder for the junta to get away with that. That may
  be one reason they want to keep foreigners out.


Blame the foreign media that were biased in re****ting the Tibetan
riot in China ! Surely, Myanmar don't want these western media to create
news against them !

May be these western media can use tsunami pictures as picture taken
in Myanmar to trick their own people ! LOL!

 
------=_NextPart_000_00E1_01C8B299.B86C39E0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16640" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
  <DIV>&lt;<A href=3D"mailto:bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt; =
wrote in=20
  message <A=20
  =
href=3D"news:d5cc774f-1656-4cd5-a82c-6cf09d2052c3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">news:d5cc774f-1656-4cd5-a82c-6cf09d2052c3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>...</DIV>On=20
  May 9, 3:49 pm, PaPaPeng &lt;<A=20
  href=3D"mailto:PaPaP...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">PaPaP...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>&gt; =
wrote:<BR>&gt; On=20
  Fri, 9 May 2008 14:47:02 -0700 (PDT), <A=20
  href=3D"mailto:bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
">bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:<BR>&gt; =
&gt;What if=20
  only one grain of rice reaches the people? You're saying that<BR>&gt; =
&gt;no=20
  matter how shameless and horrible the junta is, we should bend =
over<BR>&gt;=20
  &gt;backwards to comply with their edicts, even if it means more=20
  people<BR>&gt; &gt;will die. Sovereignty is im****tant but in so is =
saving=20
  lives, arguably<BR>&gt; &gt;moreso in this case. It's too bad the =
junta is in=20
  charge. They don't<BR>&gt; &gt;deserve to be.<BR>&gt;<BR>&gt; This is =
a human=20
  disaster not a morality play. There is no place for<BR>&gt; good and =
evil=20
  battles. Do what is possible first and that is to get<BR>&gt; drinking =
water=20
  food and shelter, medical supplies to the disaster<BR>&gt; site. Who =
gets the=20
  supplies is irrelevant at this moment. The<BR>&gt; im****tant thing is =
to get=20
  the stuff there on the ground. Then argue<BR>&gt; about the fairness =
and the=20
  morality of allocation. <BR><BR>OK, but if there is a way to put =
pressure on=20
  the junta not to behave<BR>as they have been behaving, and get more =
aid to the=20
  people and have<BR>more trained personnel involved, it would save =
lives.=20
  Having trained<BR>professionals involved could make a world of=20
  difference.<BR><BR>&gt; If the regime is stupid enough to hoard the =
supplies=20
  only for itself<BR>&gt; then the anger of the people will have a =
unstoppable=20
  basis to topple<BR>&gt; the regime with. By then their lives are =
already=20
  written off and dying<BR>&gt; with a bullet is better than their =
families and=20
  themselves slowly<BR>&gt; starving to death. The ordinary army ranks =
will=20
  certain not sup****t<BR>&gt; a regime that immoral for their own =
families will=20
  also die in the<BR>&gt; disaster.<BR><BR>You might be right. Though =
the junta=20
  might see to it that the military<BR>and their families are well-fed, =
even if=20
  the rest of the people are<BR>not. If I were a murderous dictator =
mainly=20
  interested in keeping power<BR>that's what I might do. Of course, if =
foreign=20
  aid workers were present<BR>it would be much harder for the junta to =
get away=20
  with that. That may<BR>be one reason they want to keep foreigners=20
out.<BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV>Blame the foreign media that&nbsp;were biased&nbsp;in re****ting the =

Tibetan</DIV>
<DIV>riot in China ! Surely, Myanmar don't want these&nbsp;western media =

to&nbsp;create</DIV>
<DIV>news against them !</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>May be&nbsp;these&nbsp;western media can use tsunami pictures as =
picture=20
taken</DIV>
<DIV>in Myanmar to trick their own people ! LOL!</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_00E1_01C8B299.B86C39E0--




 155 Posts in Topic:
U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "Zomi" <zomi  2008-05-09 14:18:25 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-09 12:10:56 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:10 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-12 18:26:02 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:08:35 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "puhk oz" <p  2008-05-14 07:13:10 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-13 23:21:16 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 pluto_steals_again <ck  2008-05-13 16:41:21 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 baldeagle <botakeagle@  2008-05-13 16:44:48 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <ck_in_sf1@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 12:27:15 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <CKSF <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 07:18:27 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-10 11:57:44 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <CKSF <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 13:35:05 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:28 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:11 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:06:10 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:13:53 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 12:58:12 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <CKSF <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 07:53:40 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "~" <~@[EMAI  2008-05-09 16:44:55 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <CKSF <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 07:53:39 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "Sir Dalai" <  2008-05-10 12:34:23 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 14:01:33 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-09 14:16:43 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <CKSF <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 07:53:37 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-11 13:20:42 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-11 14:13:09 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-11 14:23:34 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:12 
Re: I am who I am
 baldeagle <botakeagle@  2008-05-13 03:19:45 
Re: I am who I am
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-13 19:35:25 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "pluto_steals_CKSF's  2008-05-15 13:42:26 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 LarbGai <larbgai@[EMAI  2008-05-15 15:39:05 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "pluto_steals_CKSF's  2008-05-15 17:00:35 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 14:47:02 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EM  2008-05-09 22:49:58 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:14 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:06:09 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:13:50 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "labor" <lab  2008-05-12 21:57:39 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:15 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:16 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:06:08 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:13:51 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 myoethu2008@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-11 04:07:56 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 16:19:32 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "Sir Dalai" <  2008-05-10 12:31:07 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-09 16:26:58 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-10 08:54:54 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 pluto <pluto@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-10 13:35:15 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "maxwell" <m  2008-05-10 04:10:37 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:21 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:06:02 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 20:13:49 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-12 21:08:11 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:27 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-13 07:14:21 
I am who I am
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:08:34 
Re: I am who I am
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-13 19:02:33 
Re: I am who I am
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 22:01:59 
Re: I am who I am
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-14 09:42:39 
Re: I am who I am
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:57 
Re: I am who I am
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-14 20:10:41 
Re: I am who I am
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:58 
Re: I am who I am
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-14 20:07:46 
Re: I am who I am
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 22:01:57 
Re: I am who I am
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-14 09:31:04 
Re: I am who I am
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:54 
Re: I am who I am
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-14 19:48:00 
Re: I am who I am
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 21:51:07 
Re: I am who I am
 Krypsis <krypsis@[EMAI  2008-05-15 00:39:17 
Re: I am who I am
 PaPaPeng <PaPaPeng@[EM  2008-05-15 04:24:44 
Re: I am who I am
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-15 14:58:51 
Re: I am who I am
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:55 
Re: I am who I am
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-14 20:00:56 
Re: I am who I am
 LarbGai <larbgai@[EMAI  2008-05-14 19:12:55 
Re: I am who I am
 Chabon 19 <chabon19@[E  2008-05-14 21:01:45 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 pluto_steals_again <ck  2008-05-13 16:39:35 
Re: I am who I am
 pluto_steals_again <ck  2008-05-13 16:40:10 
Re: I am who I am
 LarbGai <larbgai@[EMAI  2008-05-13 19:59:29 
Re: I am who I am
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-14 14:44:27 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <ck_in_sf1@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 16:33:04 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <ck_in_sf1@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 16:34:10 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <ck_in_sf1@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 16:35:05 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-09 16:39:31 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-09 16:44:43 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 16:58:41 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-09 17:02:43 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-09 17:12:11 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <CKSF <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 09:36:29 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-10 11:57:27 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-09 17:16:04 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <CKSF <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 09:38:41 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:24 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:05:59 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 myoethu2008@[EMAIL PROTEC  2008-05-09 20:35:09 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <CKSF <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 13:35:08 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSF <ck_in_sf1@[EMAIL  2008-05-09 20:39:18 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "ltlee1@[EMAIL PROTE  2008-05-10 08:27:38 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSFuckspluto <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 09:46:17 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CKSFuckspluto <ck_in_s  2008-05-10 09:47:17 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 CharlesLiu <chliu528@[  2008-05-10 10:32:03 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:25 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:05:58 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:26 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 demorising@[EMAIL PROTECT  2008-05-10 11:40:19 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 12:06:13 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-10 12:12:19 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 12:14:37 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-11 15:07:22 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-10 12:24:03 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 12:45:19 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-11 15:21:54 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 pluto <pluto@[EMAIL PR  2008-05-11 18:20:16 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-11 17:37:56 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:19 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:06:05 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:20 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:06:04 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-12 21:00:03 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:19 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-13 07:28:52 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 13:08:33 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-13 19:30:28 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-13 22:01:55 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-14 10:07:23 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:51 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:17:53 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-14 20:17:04 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 21:58:47 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-15 06:34:03 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-15 14:32:22 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Good soldier <Decypher  2008-05-15 14:57:55 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-15 20:46:59 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "labor" <lab  2008-05-14 21:56:03 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:18 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:06:06 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 12:51:04 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 12:57:12 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 16:35:23 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "CKinSF <ck_in_sf  2008-05-12 19:06:01 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 "labor" <lab  2008-05-12 21:49:50 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-12 23:00:20 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-10 13:36:55 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-10 13:53:16 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 15:05:42 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 15:10:10 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 rst0wxyz <rst0wxyz@[EM  2008-05-10 15:18:23 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-10 22:44:02 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-05-12 11:16:56 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Yu <yugaung@[EMAIL PRO  2008-05-12 18:52:34 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 AirRaid <airraidfighte  2008-05-13 07:15:35 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSP  2008-05-14 16:18:00 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 pluto_steals_again <ck  2008-05-13 16:42:20 
Re: U.N. 'furious' as Myanmar aid 'seized'
 pluto_steals_again <ck  2008-05-15 13:30:07 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup
Contact
tan13V112 Fri Jul 25 10:08:34 CDT 2008.