Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > Burma > Re: To a certai...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 3 of 5 Topic 10188 of 11517
Post > Topic >>

Re: To a certain JAMES. for clearence.

by James <James.Russell.Brownwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > May 12, 2008 at 02:46 AM

So Mogyothwar,

You've issued quite a large reaction to my previous posting (of 2 May
2008) under your headline of "They must not be allowed to exist". I'll
try to issue an appropriate response.

First of all I know, of course, that you are not at all an NLD or
opposition sympathizer. I was just joking about the ambiguous subject
of your posting. And you understood that as you explained at the end
of your posting. You also said that you are not a sup****ted of the
SPDC, while in another article in this newsgroup (soc.culture.burma)
you clearly state to belong to the SPDC (your reply to Labor of 6 May
2008, subject "SANDO, MOGYOTHWA, BURMARSOLDIER - WHAT THE HELL IS
THIS , YOU CALL THIS FAIR DO YOU ???"). There you tell us "Do you see
SPDC campaigning through these forums? Yes a few of us express our
views, that is our right, have you thought of that? We have the same
rights as you have.". In there "us", "our" and "we" clearly refer to
the SPDC members isn't it? Now, what status do you have? What is your
credibility? I will assume you are an SPDC sup****ted at least. Good to
know the enemy.

Secondly it is my strong impression that the discussion in the
newsgroup soc.culture.burma is far below the level that I thought it
would be. Opponents of the junta often post shorter and longer quotes
of news agencies abroad, only adding their own subject line, often in
the form of a question (IN CAPITALS) whether the contents of the
message present something fair or not. They seem to lack their own
opinions. Sup****ters of the junta, like you, often reply with
arguments stating that other countries don't do much good either to
countries in other parts of the world. That way they/you justify the
evil events happening in Burma, though without directly responding to
the questions and quoted articles. A real fruitful discussion is often
lacking completely. (Well, sometimes I've indeed seen real discussions
going on, often flaming, which I don't appreciate.)

I don't think I'll join the group in a regular active discussion. It
would hardly contribute to my goal to reach as many of the Burmese
citizens with my compassion to their political, social and physical
situation. Like many other people, organizations and nations I want to
contribute (even if it is just a little) to the liberation of the
people from its totalitarian rulers. I have no wish to change you or
the generals or your and their opinions; I think I can't. All I want
is to remove their (physical, military) power, with which the generals
dominate, manipulate, scare and lie to their citizens in a way
comparable to Big Brother in the book "1984" by George Orwell (1948).
I want to eliminate their power to rule over the people, whether they
like it or not. The people should and want to rule over themselves,
like in a real democracy, Power To The People. I don't want to
eliminate any person physically, not even the generals themselves; I
only would prefer them to be brought to court for their crimes and to
stand a fair trial. But that is secondary; if their power would be
gone and they would live on as free citizens that would be fine to me
too as long as the people would be completely free from their
influence.

From your postings I read that you would like to eliminate (torture
and kill without any fair trial) the opposition, the NLD, ASSK and
similar sup****ters personally and physically. You use terms as "they
should be executed" and "drown them" if you would be ruling Burma.
Well that is exactly what this all is about: violent repression, not
allowing opposite opinions, puni****ng, imprisoning (referendum law and
decree 5/96) and even killing people for it. You clearly and
unambiguously give yourself away as a violent and evil person.
Whatever reason(s) you may have to desire killing and oppression, such
evil is criminal and totally unacceptable from the civilized view of
respecting each others human lifes. That is why I was attacking you
verbally and joked with you as I said in the beginning. Just thinking
and expressing threats like that may not be an offence, but carrying
out those threats certainly is. You and people like you are a danger
to the society; you have been warned. That is also why I am fighting
the government (with words). They obviously disrespect their citizens
lifes, in particular in the current situation by withholding much of
the (western) emergency aid after the natural disaster. I do not only
know this from the news that leaks out of Burma and is distributed
abroad, but also first hand from people inside Burma. The people do
NOT want the junta government, they do NOT want the fake constitution
and referendum; they want a modern democracy without any (not even
partial) influence of the junta, who are the actual destructionists,
the killers.

To me the forced wielding of power by people over other people is an
absolutely objectionable issue. It is not a matter of taste, of
personal preference, not just another opinion or something disputable
for which a solution would consist of some compromise. No, such a
policy is absolutely wrong and must be expelled. I won't repeat all
further reasons, events, condemnations to sup****t that in detail here
as I already did in my distributed emails (see
http://rapidshare.com/files/111245632/JoinRevolutionBurma24apr08.zip_.html).
You don't need to point me to other atrocities in the world. They are
there indeed, more or less comparable to those inside Burma (and,
after all, that has been the reason for international intervention to
liberate the citizens from the feudal regimes). Those atrocities
elsewhere are no reason to abandon Burma. However large the scale of
suppression in the world is and has been, it is not normal, not fair
and not acceptable. Burma is my target. People like you are my target
and I will continue to fight such people verbally. The repression in
Burma must stop as soon as possible, today preferably. The generals
should be deactivated, fired and arrested immediately. Besides they
have no legal status at all (1990 elections), neither has the advanced
rigged referendum.

I am convinced my verbal fight for freedom in Burma is absolutely
justified, no doubt about that. And being in a privileged position to
be able to do so I will do so for those who are not in such a
position. As said I need to reach the Burmese people and the
government, not so much you. I only hope I have explained my
viewpoints sufficiently clear. I have no wish to prolong this
discussion with you personally. You are on the wrong side and you
clearly will remain on the wrong side, I have given you in. I can only
hope, not force, that once you will grasp or experience that you are
under the influence of evil.

James Russell Brownwood

James.Russell.Brownwood@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 3 mei, 12:35, mogyothwar <ziza...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> My Dear James,
>
> Thank you for replying to my artical under the headline of " They must
> not be allowed to exist."
>
[...]
 




 5 Posts in Topic:
To a certain JAMES. for clearence.
mogyothwar <zizawar@[E  2008-05-03 03:35:37 
Re: To a certain JAMES. for clearence.
bmargyi@[EMAIL PROTECTED]  2008-05-05 01:35:03 
Re: To a certain JAMES. for clearence.
James <James.Russell.B  2008-05-12 02:46:16 
Re: To a certain JAMES. for clearence.
mogyothwar <zizawar@[E  2008-05-12 03:26:43 
Re: To a certain JAMES. for clearence.
James <James.Russell.B  2008-05-12 12:31:50 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Fri Dec 5 5:46:35 CST 2008.