Re: I am who I am

On Wed, 14 May 2008 16:17:58 +0800, Jim Walsh
<jimNOwalsSPAMh3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>On Wed, 14 May 2008 10:42:39 +0800, Good soldier wrote
>(in article <uojk241lltijgtbn0m3j60ovdr2bk6kgjv@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
>> Or is that really just an excuse to promote your particular ideas about
aid 
>> workers and disparage my actual observations?  
>
>If you intend to testify about what you have seen, you have to do so
under 
>your real name.


I do? Who made that rule? 

Certainly the newspapers publish news with a byline of "Our Re****ter".

I could go on with additional examples but why bother. You have
invented a "law" that you use to disparage anything you disagree with
and undoubtedly you have other home made "laws" to cover other
situations.

But certainly your sense of fair play is sadly lacking. You seem to
believe that it is correct and proper for your good self to post using
a fake email address but intolerable for me to post with a pen name. I
assume that you refuse to read Mark Twain......

Cheers,

schweik
(Correct Address is goodsoldierschweikatgmaildotcom)