Re: british government moves war****ps into the region

"PaPaPeng" <PaPaPeng@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:1m4s24hi9n5e40vqqgkntcmvf1aes8f2o4@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Fri, 16 May 2008 14:06:42 -0700 (PDT), bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
>
> >>
> >> >I realize you fancy yourself an expert on all things naval, but I
> >> >suspect you are mistaken here.
> >>
> >> Then provide the rebuttal on technical details.
> >
> >I don't know all the technical details. But the article says the ****ps
> >are ready to rush supplies and you insist that they are not. Why
> >should we believe you rather than the article? How do you know?
> >
> >Perhaps someone on sci.military.naval can respond to your claim that
> >the British war****ps cannot possibly be of help to the Burmese relief
> >effort. Your claim seems highly suspect to me.
>
>
> Small war****ps so quickly and conveniently offshore ready to help?
> What can they do?  The coast ****t facilities are wreaked.  What
> equipment or supplies can they bring ashore to bear using their
> lifeboats? The crew size of their ****p is around 150 or less, most of
> whom will be needed to man the ****p.  What can a dozen or two sailors
> do except get in the way?   I haven't come across any mainstream
> re****t making a case for them to be allowed to do rescue work.  But I
> do see a lot of nonsense about the West having the moral right to
> invade, overthrow the government and to force their "aid" onto
> Myanmar.


other than you no one is mentioning invading burma.