On May 29, 7:28=A0am, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On May 29, 5:14 am, bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 28, 5:20 am, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > On May 28, 7:23 pm, Nyi Nyi <nyi...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > On May 28, 9:17 am, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > On May 28, 4:25 am, bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > > > > > On May 27, 8:23 am, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > On May 27, 11:07 pm, "truth" <tr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > In actual fact more than two million people needed help
urge=
ntly.
>
> > > > > > > > "baldeagle" <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > > > > >
>news:e16b847a-5335-432e-859f-b00c476c651c@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > > > > > UN now say over 2 millions needed help urgently....they
ar=
e
> > > > > > > > > dying ..dying of injuries, dying of hunger, dying of
sickn=
ess. 2
> > > > > > > > > millions !?
>
> > > > > > > > > This picture is pure fantasy, media creation....it
started=
from a few
> > > > > > > > > hundred, to few thousands, to near a million, and now
over=
2
> > > > > > > > > millions....soon they'll say, it's over 2 billions!
>
> > > > > > > > > Exactly how many people were living along the path of
the =
cyclone,
> > > > > > > > > stretching from Seikkyi, to Bogale, to Yegyeung (just
sout=
h of
> > > > > > > > > Rangoon). There are less than 20 small towns located
along=
the cyclone
> > > > > > > > > path as the whole delta area is mainly farm lands with
=A0=
farm houses
> > > > > > > > > located FAR apart. =A02 millions victims is pure
fantasy.
>
> > > > > > > > > Cyclone has been hitting the bay of Forida and Mexico
> > > > > > > > > repeatedly ...Were there 2 millions victims. NO.
>
> > > > > > > > > The UN has NO creditability....no better than western
medi=
a.
>
> > > > > > > >
>http://www.2space.net/news/article.php?art=3D119851&ut=3D12=
10059948
>
> > > > > > > proof ?
>
> > > > > > Do you admit that *anyone* in Burma ...
>
> > > > > Don't digress.
> > > > > Proof ...of UN claims ...over 2 millions victims....
>
> > > > > Show proof ...or you are a liar.
>
> > > > it's like you are counting the numbers instead helping hand. if we
> > > > are
> > > > making a list who, what, which and why I guess your aid of onions
an=
d
> > > > potatoes will get rotten soon.
>
> > > Nope. No one ask you to make a list.
> > > Some idiots say there are two millions cyclone
> > > victims needing help urgently, or they die.
>
> > > I ask for proof ....of the dying victims.
>
> > > You see this is how western media, and their NGOs
> > > created the fictitious victims....
> > > It started with a few thousands weeks ago, =A0then
> > > it become tens of thousands, then hundreds of
> > > thousands, then almost a million, then over one
> > > millions...then, over two millions...
>
> > > bmo and truth....
> > > You have not responded with proof...you are liars.
>
> > Is it in any way clear to you that it's hard to get information about
> > what is really happening in Burma?
>
> Hard to get info....so is it right for western
> media and the UN to fabricate the number of victims
> in danger of losing their life !!!
> So is it right for people like you to repeat lies....
> saying more than 2 millions cyclone victims are
> in danger of losing their lives ???.
>
> If you cannot show proof, then you are a liar
Not surprisingly, it is you who are the liar. I never said that 2
million people are in danger of losing their lives. I said that the
situation is dire for many people. Many people are in danger; I don't
know the number. But the real issue here is that many people are in
danger. You refuse to talk about it. OK, but in that case your opinion
is worthless. You have a little boy obsession with a number and no
apparent sympathy for the victims. They are victims of both a natural
disaster and of the bastards who run the Burmese government. But you
won't admit that there is any problem with the junta. That is why, in
this case, you have no credibility.


|