On Mar 7, 6:00=A0am, "ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 6:14=A0am, "TFK" <tfkmjk6...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > The **** is dribbling from your moth again - mouth arese no different
i =
your
> > case - bothe recepticles for a CCP *****
>
> If you don't agree with him, why can't you just tell lhim you don't
> agree with him for reasons 1, 2, 3 and etc?
Your dishonest arguments are as bad as namecalling, if not worse.
> In this case, I will agree with the other netter.
Because he agrees with your agenda. That's the only reason.
> In her book, "THE TYRRANNY OF THE MAJORITY" (actually a collection of
> her
> law review articles with a introducing first chapter), Lani Guinier
> was presenting
> many ways to overcome the tyrrany of the majority problem in America.
>
> And of course, she was not the onlyone who sees the tyrrany of the
> majoirty a
> persistent problme in American politics. She is but a long list of
> people who
> "have sought to change the rules in order to improve the system. There
> have been
> three generations of attempts to curb tyranny majorieies. The first
> generation..."
More cut and pasting but no real evidence of any serious "Tyranny of
the Majority" caused by American democracy. Racism is a problem, yes,
but that's the root cause, not democracy.
> In her book, Lani Guinier was fghting for the black minority which is
> sizeable.
> For really tiny minority like the Lhobas tribe of China, the normal
> democratic
> process will have close ot zero chance to have any voice.
Why won't you acknowledge the fact that the NPC is a rubber-stamp
organization and has no power? Oh, right, because that fact conflicts
with your dishonest agenda. You're still not fooling anyone.
|
