On Mar 13, 1:33=A0pm, "OM ****VA!108" <grimus...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mar 13, 6:07 pm, "ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 13, 6:34 am, gerberk <greatb...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > Calling people names in ng's isn't going to further your or your
> > > buddies' cause. It only makes you part of the moronic babble gang
that=
> > > infests ng's. If you think thatTibetshould be independent from
> > > China, you should present your case with facts, references and
> > > historical notes. Otherwise people will only treat you like a
moronic
> > > troll.
>
> > Bascially, these guys have no valid cause.
> > The pro-Tibetan movement is racist in nature.
>
> > The Tibet independence movement is basically a racist movement
> > comparable to the white supremacist movement.
>
> > 1. Both Tibetan movements and America white supremacist movement
> > are supremacist movement recasted as racial survival. Central to both
> > movements are "spiritual people" attempting to preserve their
> > spiritual
> > identity.
>
> > Free America sup****ters (aka white supremacists) see the underlying
> > issue as "the subjugation and eventual destruction of God's chosen
> > people, white Israel." Similarly, Tibetan supremacist feeling is also
> > carefully
> > disguised under Tibetan spirituality. And the line of reasoning is
> > something
> > like this. Since the Tibetans are from a culture of spirituality, the
> > Tibetans
> > must not be contaminated by non-tibetans such as Han Chinese.
> > Economic
> > development and effort to improve Tibetan lives are often protrayed
> > as
> > cultural genocide.
>
> > 2. In reality both are based on racism. Free America sup****ters (aka
> > White supremacists) are racism against all colored people in the U.S.
> > Free Tibet sup****ters are racism against non-Tibetan Chinese. White
> > supremacist racism is well known. How about Free Tibet?
>
> > The following is how an award winning essay described the Chinese
> > people. What is very very Chinese?
>
> >http://www.savetibet.org/programs/lotessay/2002/2ndplacea.php
>
> > "This is because the near ones have an absolutely different set of
> > thoughts that are so un-Tibetan but very, very Chinese. The inner
> > feelings lack the human touch, the human quality, the caring nature,
> > the loving heart and every thing that is gentle. They are like human
> > robots with no human feelings."
>
> > > On Mar 13, 10:07 am, "TFK" <tfkmjk6...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > > Imperialist running dog
>
> > > > "J.Venning" <J.Venn...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:47d812af$0$15873$edfadb0f@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> > > > > "OM ****VA!108" <grimus...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > > >
>news:569e49eb-a4ce-4b19-99d3-7d3835f1e174@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >> Oh shut up - if you really don't know please go away and do
some
> > > > >> reading, if you are taking the piss then stop. Genocide is
happen=
ing
> > > > >> inTibetand all right thinking people should sup****t Tibetan
> > > > >> sovereignty, which is what the people want.
> > > > >> TIBETAN TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY!
>
> > > > > =A0 =A0So, anyone who doesn't agree with you should shut up. Is
th=
at it? That
> > > > > must be your Tibetan philosophy, which no one wants!Tibetis a
part=
of
> > > > > China, and will forever remain so.
> > > > > Ommmm .........- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> Get it right - the Tibetan sovereignty cause is righteous and the
> suppression of Tibetan identity by the colonialist chinese state is
> racism.
What sovereignty?
When was Tibet an international recognized independent political
unit the last time?
Sorry to inform you that international boundary is a matter of
international recognition. There is no god to devine whch piece
of land for what people, to owe and to hold forever and ever.
At present Tibet is recognized as part of China. If non-Chinese
has problem, they should complain to their government first and
foremost.
Read the following again. It was written by one. But it would not
chosen as a winner if it did not represents the thought of many
Tibetan exiles.
http://www.savetibet.org/programs/lotessay/2002/2ndplacea.php
"This is because the near ones have an absolutely different set of
thoughts that are so un-Tibetan but very, very Chinese. The inner
feelings lack the human touch, the human quality, the caring nature,
the loving heart and every thing that is gentle. They are like human
robots with no human feelings."
If you don't agree with the above, may be you should protest against
the savetibet first.
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
