On Mar 16, 10:28=A0am, Andrei Vlasov <vlasov4...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> In article <ef8f1bef-2108-42d6-90c6-80360d764013
> @[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, rst0w...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
>
>
> > Which is bigger, the Olympics or the national survival? =A0Is there
> > really a choice?
>
> If China needs to maintain wholesale terror to sustain its
> integrity, obviously it is a house of cards and should be dismantled as
> soon as possible.
To the U.S., any nation with the slidest chance of challenging the
U.S. is a threat, and the biggest threat is China. This is all the
CIA's work to "divide and conquer" China. Brand-new hundred dollar
bill would do wonders for people with no job, no way of making a
living, and God-send instigator for their cause.
>
> In any case, a serious olympic boycott is the more immediate threat and
> must be addressed first. Massacre of Tibetans is not the best way
> to "solve" that problem.
Do you think China care when the country is at stake? They did it to
their people right at the Tiananmen Square!!! Tibet is far away and
less meaningful.
|
