On Mar 16, 6:18=A0pm, "truth" <tr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> For every links u put up I can easily post an opposing
> links.
Yes. Of course. Don't worry, LT Lee has no credibility around here. He
is one of the NG buffoons.
> The Dalai Lama is a man of great Wisdom and Vision.
> China must engage him to solve this Tibetan problem.
> Otherwise the Chinese will have to pay an increasing
> price in the future.
> Both the pro-Tibetans and pro-Chinese are wrong.
> Both of these camps can go to hell. They will not help
> to solve the Tibetan problem for the benefits of all
> concern.
>
> <ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
>
news:2e6b73ed-8164-4b6e-97ab-5743b9201174@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Mar 16, 8:52 am, "truth" <tr...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > It is obvious now that China brought the current Tibet problems
> > upon itself by not engaging the Dalai Lama.
> > The Dalai Lama is a peaceful loving and reasonable person.
> > Had China engaged the Dalai Lama instead of ostracising him,
> > the situation in Tibet would not have developed into its' current
> > state.
> > The Tibetans are wrong to attack, injured and killed the ordinary
> > Chinese people for their greviences with the Central government.
> > The Chinese Authorities must now act with restrains to stop the
> > violences. The culprits should be fairly dealth with. If they need to
> > be punished, then punish them. Chinese Authorities must adopt
> > a sort of big brotherly mentality like the way they deal with the
> > Muslim minorities in Hainan Island. They must now engaged with
> > the Dalai Lama to find a solution to the question of Tibet without
> > endangering China's control over the territory. Give the Tibetan
> > autonomy in certain areas like religion, cultural and traditional
> > practices. These Tibetans must also be help economically. Only
> > in this way can China win over the hearts and minds of the Tibetan
> > people. The Dalai Lama has admitted that it is in Tibetans' interests
> > to remain a part of China.
>
> The tragic thing is that the DL is not much of a political leader.
> His wisdom of governing is remained at the stage of how a
> parrot handler should treat a pet parrot.
>
> http://www.time.com/time/asia/magazine/2000/0717/tibet_sb1.html
>
> --------------------------------
>
> TIME: Can the Tibetans ever be loyal to a Chinese regime?
> "...When I was young, I had a beautiful parrot. One attendant always
> fed that parrot and so it was absolutely loyal to him. I got a little
> bit jealous. On a few occasions, I fed it. But it never showed me any
> loyalty. Then I used a stick. And then the loyalty was absolutely
> gone."
>
> --------------------------------
>
> Simply put, governance menas responsiblity. It is far more than
> bribing the people for their loyalty.
>
> If the PRC simply wanted loyalty, the first thing was not to treat
> them as citizens, but colonial subjects. China simply had to build
> more
> monasteries, to acknowledge and sup****t more God-kings. The
> oversupply
> of God-kings from different sects, new and old, will then compete for
> good will and subsidies from Beijing. Living standard would remain
> low
> in Tibet. Birth rate would drop with more Tibetans devoted to
> Buddhism.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
|
