On Mar 18, 9:24=A0am, PaPaPeng <PaPaP...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 14:26:07 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >On Mar 17, 1:11=A0pm, PaPaPeng <PaPaP...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008 10:43:44 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> >It's ugly, but it's not a mother pu****ng a baby carriage. Did you
> >> >watch the same video I did?
>
> >> I went back to the URL provided on two separate occasions and it had
> >> the same scene. =A0If its not a mother pu****nga =A0baby carraige then
w=
hat
> >> did you see? =A0
>
> >A man riding a 2-wheeled vehicle, probably a bicycle
>
> >> Another thing that bothered me is the clarity of the audio recording.
> >> You can't record that victim's screams from the distance, at least 50
> >> feet on the first flloor across a street, where the cameraman is.
> >> Surely there must be plenty of secondary noises from that scene.
>
> >> When viewing videos and photos of the riots I am also suspicious of
> >> the absence of business signs in Chinese or in Tibetan. =A0Those
signs
> >> are characteristic and unavoidable in any =A0Chinese city.
>
> There is no bicycle in the video Charles gave the URL link to. =A0Can
> Charles describe what we are supposed to have seen?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
There is clearly a bicycle in this video, titled "Tibet Riot, you
won't see this on CNN and BBC"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DJZLzKBvvGMg
I don't understand how anyone could see a baby carriage
|
