Re: Tibet

On 19 Mar, 12:15, Ira IRa IRA Humperdink MD <markdeme...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
> On Mar 19, 6:47=A0am, Absorbed <purestdeform...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > J.Venning wrote:
> > > "Absorbed" <purestdeform...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
> > >news:frpmsc$8ro$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> It's a fair point, but it doesn't have anything to do with what Tom
> > >> said. In fact, it's completely unrelated.
>
> > > =A0 =A0In which case it's pointless for you to read any of my posts.
>
> > Just because I consider something unrelated doesn't necessarily mean I
> > consider it pointless.
>
> > > There
> > > are a large number of other threads written by other posters that
you
> > > may find related to your taste and your point of view.
>
> > I haven't stated a point of view concerning the subject of the thread.
> > Like in your other posts, you appear to assume that anyone who
disagrees=

> > with you must be somehow against China.
>
> he's a ****in' chink. what else can you expect?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

A reasoned and measured approach to paranoia seems sensible.
Unfortunately, he's not just paranoid, there really could be people
out to get him, so he's probably going to remain a hopeless case
unless he's willing to pull that weed out by the roots from himself.