On Mar 19, 1:52=A0pm, hillelg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Mar 19, 11:49 am, HHW <coaster132...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > None, especially if you speak of the lands occupied in 1967. The right
> > of annexation by conquest is gone from International Law. You're out
> > of date.
>
> Tell me about that after China will return the part of India,
> which is about as large as Israel & Palestine combined, back.
Go ahead, declare openly that Israel is determined to keep the West
Bank and American opinion be damned. Go ahead, change Israeli
propaganda about the nasty Palestinians and tell the truth about your
actual intentions. One of the reasons Israeli politicians are not
trusted is that they always spin what's actually happening
unconscionably.
>
> To those like HHW who have no clue about the real world
seehttp://en.wikip=
edia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War
When are you going to bring up parallels in the Franco-Prussian and
Crimean Wars? You should be able to mine them to good advantage. Six
or eight Wiki paragraphs and you're off and running.
>
> Also, when will Serbia get Kosavo back?
It's not law, it's politics. This legal thread is Ed Rosen's nitwit
idea.
|
