There is a saying that spacecraft need only to be successful once to earn
headline news. But airplanes ferrying passengers will be used over and
over
again. So the issue here is whether their untested new planes are "crashy"
or not :)))
"TruBlu" <trublu@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
news:frsb1r$p50$1@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> What rubbish is this? The Chinese have been sending their astronauts
into
> space and very soon will perform space walks and land their craft on the
> moon. This requires more high technology than a passenger plane. Is
anyone
> still suggesting they can't built a passenger plane safely?
> "TuoLongDuong" <jismquiff@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message
>
news:8cba0318-d445-4462-9370-ee39f78c7022@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> I'd say give any BIG JETS the Chinks make about 10 years, then maybe
>> CONSIDER flying on one of them -- IF TOO MANY DEADLY CRASHES have not
>> occurred by then.
>>
>> First, you have to worry about the overall quality of construction. I
>> mean, look at the TOYS these jokers make!
>>
>> Then, you REALLY have to worry about whether MAINTENANCE is performed
>> regularly, if at all!
>
>
|
