> > On Mar 19, 11:49 am, HHW <coaster132...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > None, especially if you speak of the lands occupied in 1967. The
right
> > > of annexation by conquest is gone from International Law. You're out
> > > of date.
> On Mar 19, 1:52 pm, hillelg...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > Tell me about that after China will return the part of India,
> > which is about as large as Israel & Palestine combined, back.
On Mar 19, 8:10 pm, HHW <coaster132...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Go ahead, declare openly that Israel is determined to keep the West
> Bank and American opinion be damned.
He can't because it isn't.
>Go ahead, change Israeli
> propaganda about the nasty Palestinians and tell the truth about your
> actual intentions.
Israel has never had any need to concoct propaganda about nasty
"Palestinians" -- unlike the obverse. -- The so-called "Palestinians"
are perfectly capable of producing scads of negative press about
themselves with no assistance.
> One of the reasons Israeli politicians are not
> trusted is that they always spin what's actually happening
> unconscionably.
That's Pallie politicians, you ignorant ass.
> > To those like HHW who have no clue about the real world
seehttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War
> When are you going to bring up parallels in the Franco-Prussian and
> Crimean Wars?
Why not? Humper spends ten months swi****ng around three little
questions rather than answering them directly.
> > Also, when will Serbia get Kosavo back?
> It's not law, it's politics. This legal thread is Ed Rosen's nitwit
> idea.
Ed Rosen hasn't posted here in months, Humper, you old whore. All that
tequila you guzzle must have gone to your head. You must be further
distracted by thought of all those Mexican kiddies available for you
to diddle over Easter.
Deborah
|
