On Mar 21, 9:00 pm, jsav...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(John Savard)
wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:28:49 -0700 (PDT), "ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
> <ltl...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote, in part:
>
> >1. Does the world really have the right to know? To be more specific,
> >what is the world's right to what information about Tibet, China? What
> >do they really want to know? And why is that a right?
>
> The closed-circuit security camera in a bank stops sending a signal.
>
> Do they send down a repairman? No. It is assumed a robbery is in
> progress, so the police are summoned.
>
> China has chased out the foreign press. Fine. We'll assume a genocide is
> in progress. First, neutralize the nuclear armaments of China.
>
> Then - regime change.
>
> China is bigger than Iraq, so there will be a draft this time.
>
> But, like Iraq, if we don't happen to find a genocide, just like not
> finding WMDs, G. W. Bush shouldn't let that bother him. The world is a
> better place with China moving towards democracy!
>
> John Savardhttp://www.quadibloc.com/index.html
LOL okay old man, stop your mental masturbation and go to sleep
|
