Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: On the issu...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 66 of 128 Topic 42546 of 53887
Post > Topic >>

Re: On the issue of Tibet...

by niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mar 23, 2008 at 03:54 AM

On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:16:13 -0700, tankfixer
<paul.carrier@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:

>In article <n797u3pb8b72ll14164t4dfae1vl6c90t2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, 
>nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 says...
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:05:46 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc
>> <jsavard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> 
>> >On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:32:06 -0700 (PDT), "fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
>> ><fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote, in part:
>> >
>> >>There's an American senator named Charlie Keel. He believes that
China
>> >>occupied the country of Tibet in 1951. Many Americans believe in this
>> >>claim as well, mainly because their geographical knowledge is too
>> >>poor. Recently, the American media starts to spread this false claim
>> >>again, and they said such things like even though Japan changed
>> >>history in its textbooks, China also concealed the occupation of
>> >>Tibet. This post will clarify many things and review some history
with
>> >>you.
>> >
>> >>In 1951, China occupied Tibet, this is a fact. The reason is that as
>> >>the Chinese Civil War ended, Chinese troops from 1948-1951 not only
>> >>occupied Tibet, it also occupied Heilongjiang, it also occupied
Hainan
>> >>Island, it also occupied all provinces of China. So occupation of
>> >>Tibet is natural, because Tibet has of course always been a part of
>> >>China.
>> >
>> >Taiwan has always been part of China, too. The Communist rebels did
>> >not always control China, though. They were evil bullies. We know this
>> >because of how Mao, to keep his control of power, abandoned the
>> >successful measures of other people in feeding China, and instituted
>> >the Great Leap Forwards which caused mass starvation; we know this
>> >because of the Cultural Revolution.
>> >
>> >Tibetans did not endure such abuses of their religion
>> 
>> There has never been any religion in Tibet. There was only an evil
>> cult in Tibet which stole and tempered the teaching of Buddha to put
>> it into its own use for the purpose of ruling over the Tibetan people
>> both politically and religiously. This cult is in blatant
>> contradiction with the teaching of Buddha which advocates helping all
>> sentient beings instead of ruling over them with slavery.
>> 
>> You and the entire western world have been fooled by Da-Lie Lama.
>
>I see the agents of state security are busy

Actually, I just uncovered a CIA operation here in soc.culture.china.
The operatives are rst0wxyz who is a Japanese pretending to be a
Chinese student and J.Venning from Holland who tries everything he can
to paint himself as a Chinese sympathizer. There are also others, but
I will focus on these two for now.
 




 128 Posts in Topic:
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 07:15:33 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 09:17:31 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 10:55:00 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Zarya <zarya@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-21 11:11:39 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 11:34:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Zarya <zarya@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-21 12:00:15 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 12:29:53 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Zarya <zarya@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-21 12:46:43 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 13:15:24 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 22:04:20 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 17:06:30 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-25 21:18:13 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 18:46:47 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-25 22:52:36 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 19:50:17 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 11:52:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 08:01:19 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 12:42:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 08:48:11 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 13:46:10 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 11:49:50 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 16:54:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 17:58:05 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 17:21:29 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 18:47:28 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 18:14:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-27 07:27:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-27 21:22:18 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:25:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 13:29:04 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 18:01:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 14:58:33 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 19:20:31 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 19:43:48 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 20:52:19 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 21:09:23 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 17:35:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 15:17:02 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 14:44:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 16:13:57 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 16:58:04 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 18:08:39 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 17:23:38 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 18:52:50 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 13:57:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 18:03:35 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 14:48:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 17:42:13 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 03:28:45 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 13:56:05 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 16:59:11 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 13:16:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-27 21:24:31 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:24:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 19:44:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-22 19:16:13 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL   2008-03-22 22:29:32 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 03:42:38 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL   2008-03-23 06:30:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 14:33:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL   2008-03-24 16:25:35 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL   2008-03-24 16:34:02 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 16:40:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-24 21:46:10 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 16:38:55 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 03:54:24 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 04:45:31 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-23 11:43:08 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 16:07:58 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-23 16:55:30 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 03:55:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 16:13:30 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 18:04:38 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 16:19:19 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 17:47:42 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 03:33:18 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 04:35:37 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 05:37:36 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 06:00:16 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 11:30:17 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 15:14:18 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:22:03 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 03:14:01 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 13:22:07 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 17:41:14 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 15:47:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 03:57:37 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-28 08:33:50 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-24 08:13:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 11:32:37 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:20:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 03:15:36 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-24 08:08:08 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 11:21:34 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 12:31:29 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 16:55:29 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 05:33:29 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:21:33 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 03:20:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-27 08:41:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 05:52:59 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 12:40:02 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 13:20:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 17:34:53 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 15:45:15 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 19:37:52 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 16:43:16 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 04:07:49 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-28 08:34:44 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 14:20:37 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-28 12:25:06 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 16:28:53 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-28 13:59:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-29 07:53:42 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Roy Batty <roybatty@[E  2008-03-29 08:25:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Roy Batty <roybatty@[E  2008-03-29 08:30:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-29 09:55:17 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-30 06:38:55 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 15:22:21 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 19:20:09 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 23:36:50 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 04:01:58 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 14:47:51 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 18:17:39 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 10:28:01 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 10:29:20 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 17:39:47 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"peter" <pum  2008-03-23 22:35:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 23:41:39 CST 2008.