Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: On the issu...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 59 of 128 Topic 42546 of 53887
Post > Topic >>

Re: On the issue of Tibet...

by Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Mar 23, 2008 at 06:30 AM

niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:29:32 -0400, Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> wrote:
> 
>> tankfixer wrote:
>>> In article <n797u3pb8b72ll14164t4dfae1vl6c90t2@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> says...
>>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:05:46 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc
<jsavard@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:32:06 -0700 (PDT), "fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" 
>>>>> <fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote, in part:
>>>>>
>>>>>> There's an American senator named Charlie Keel. He believes that
China 
>>>>>> occupied the country of Tibet in 1951. Many Americans believe in
this claim
>>>>>> as well, mainly because their geographical knowledge is too poor.
Recently,
>>>>>> the American media starts to spread this false claim again, and
they said
>>>>>> such things like even though Japan changed history in its
textbooks, China
>>>>>> also concealed the occupation of Tibet. This post will clarify many
things
>>>>>> and review some history with you. In 1951, China occupied Tibet,
this is a
>>>>>> fact. The reason is that as the Chinese Civil War ended, Chinese
troops from
>>>>>> 1948-1951 not only occupied Tibet, it also occupied Heilongjiang,
it also
>>>>>> occupied Hainan Island, it also occupied all provinces of China. So
>>>>>> occupation of Tibet is natural, because Tibet has of course always
been a
>>>>>> part of China.
>>>>> Taiwan has always been part of China, too. The Communist rebels did
not always
>>>>> control China, though. They were evil bullies. We know this because
of how
>>>>> Mao, to keep his control of power, abandoned the successful measures
of other
>>>>> people in feeding China, and instituted the Great Leap Forwards
which caused
>>>>> mass starvation; we know this because of the Cultural Revolution.
>>>>>
>>>>> Tibetans did not endure such abuses of their religion
>>>> There has never been any religion in Tibet. There was only an evil
cult in Tibet
>>>> which stole and tempered the teaching of Buddha to put it into its
own use for
>>>> the purpose of ruling over the Tibetan people both politically and
religiously.
>>>> This cult is in blatant contradiction with the teaching of Buddha
which
>>>> advocates helping all sentient beings instead of ruling over them
with slavery.
>>>>
>>>> You and the entire western world have been fooled by Da-Lie Lama.
>>> I see the agents of state security are busy
>> When the people of Tibet figure out that a very few men armed with a
little knowledge
>> about IEDs were able to stonewall the entire US forces (costing them
hundreds of
>> billions) in Iraq and the UN in Afghanistan, they will have it even
better then the
>> Taliban because the population would be behind them 100%
> 
> Not in a million years. Keep dreaming. A handful Lamas who rely on
> government salary to stay alive will never be able to fulfill your
> fantasy. How sad for you. Your vicious evil intent will never be
> fulfilled.

Yea and a handful of Pakistanis couldn't drive NATO nuts either.   (O:

Who do you write propaganda for????   The Chinese embassy?
 




 128 Posts in Topic:
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 07:15:33 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 09:17:31 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 10:55:00 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Zarya <zarya@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-21 11:11:39 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 11:34:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Zarya <zarya@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-21 12:00:15 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 12:29:53 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Zarya <zarya@[EMAIL PR  2008-03-21 12:46:43 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
nidaye@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 13:15:24 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-21 22:04:20 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 17:06:30 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-25 21:18:13 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 18:46:47 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-25 22:52:36 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 19:50:17 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 11:52:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 08:01:19 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 12:42:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 08:48:11 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 13:46:10 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 11:49:50 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 16:54:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 17:58:05 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 17:21:29 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 18:47:28 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 18:14:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-27 07:27:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-27 21:22:18 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:25:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 13:29:04 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 18:01:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 14:58:33 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 19:20:31 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 19:43:48 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 20:52:19 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 21:09:23 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 17:35:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 15:17:02 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 14:44:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 16:13:57 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 16:58:04 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 18:08:39 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 17:23:38 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-26 18:52:50 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 13:57:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 18:03:35 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 14:48:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 17:42:13 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 03:28:45 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-26 13:56:05 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-26 16:59:11 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 13:16:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Dirk Bruere at NeoPax <  2008-03-27 21:24:31 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:24:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 19:44:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-22 19:16:13 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL   2008-03-22 22:29:32 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 03:42:38 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL   2008-03-23 06:30:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 14:33:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL   2008-03-24 16:25:35 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Peter C <lpcox@[EMAIL   2008-03-24 16:34:02 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 16:40:27 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-24 21:46:10 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 16:38:55 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 03:54:24 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 04:45:31 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-23 11:43:08 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 16:07:58 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-23 16:55:30 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 03:55:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 16:13:30 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 18:04:38 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 16:19:19 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-23 17:47:42 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 03:33:18 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 04:35:37 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 05:37:36 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 06:00:16 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 11:30:17 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 15:14:18 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:22:03 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 03:14:01 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 13:22:07 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 17:41:14 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 15:47:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 03:57:37 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-28 08:33:50 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-24 08:13:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 11:32:37 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:20:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 03:15:36 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-24 08:08:08 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 11:21:34 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-24 12:31:29 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-25 16:55:29 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 05:33:29 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-26 21:21:33 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 03:20:26 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"J.Venning" <  2008-03-27 08:41:25 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 05:52:59 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 12:40:02 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 13:20:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 17:34:53 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 15:45:15 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 19:37:52 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-27 16:43:16 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 04:07:49 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-28 08:34:44 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 14:20:37 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-28 12:25:06 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 16:28:53 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-28 13:59:22 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-29 07:53:42 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Roy Batty <roybatty@[E  2008-03-29 08:25:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
Roy Batty <roybatty@[E  2008-03-29 08:30:46 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
tankfixer <paul.carrie  2008-03-29 09:55:17 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-30 06:38:55 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 15:22:21 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 19:20:09 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 23:36:50 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-28 04:01:58 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 14:47:51 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 18:17:39 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 10:28:01 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
bmoore@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 10:29:20 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
niday@[EMAIL PROTECTED]   2008-03-27 17:39:47 
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
"peter" <pum  2008-03-23 22:35:48 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Dec 1 23:40:18 CST 2008.