On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:40:55 -0700 (PDT), "akenn100@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
<akenn100@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Mar 26, 1:05?am, "fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
" <fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>
>> Define 'Tibetans' and then the 'people of Tibet'. ?Do Tibetans or the
>> people of Tibet own
>> Tibet? ?What is the central government afraid of is not the issue...
>> but perhaps the issue
>> from your sentimental point of view.
>>
>> The people in the streets also want to get a few dimes for coffee from
>> the Royal Bank of Canada too. ?What is the Bank of Canada afraid of?
>> Well, if that is what they 'want'.
>
>I know you are grasping at straws right now Francis. I know you're
>better than this from past posts.
>
>China has several tendancies informing its policies. Tendancies like
>nationalism, capitalism, socialism, chauvinism and so on.
>
>I know, from this point on, this brutal oppression of the Tibetan
>people will defined in a lot of Western media as socialist oppression.
>In a similar way, the USSR and other so called socialist states have
>behaved out of primitive feudal or cowardly tendencies and after that,
>many of you point and say - see there, look at how opressive socialism
>is.
>
>You're getting all pedantic about defining what a Tibetan is. I'll do
>it for you. A Tibetan is a person that defines him or herself as
>Tibetan. >Archie
You confuse an ordinary Tibetan people with an evil Tibetan Lama. The
ordinary Tibetan people have the freedom to live his life anywhere all
across China while the evil Tibetan Lama can only hide in Darmasala,
India.
|
