Talk About Network

Google


Register and Login
Nick
Password
Register create new account Sign up is FREE and you can post replies, new topics, bookmark posts and more!
Recover lost password


Culture > China Culture > Re: On the issu...
Latest [ Topics | Posts ] Archive Post A New Topic Post a Reply
<< Topic < Post Post 1 of 1 Topic 42883 of 51730
Post > Topic >>

Re: On the issue of Tibet...

by freedomfighterzen@[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mar 26, 2008 at 10:56 PM

On Mar 24, 12:34 pm, Peter C <lp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Peter C wrote:
> > ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >> On Sun, 23 Mar 2008 06:30:26 -0400, Peter C <lp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >>> ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
> >>>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2008 22:29:32 -0400, Peter C <lp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>> tankfixer wrote:
> >>>>>> In article <n797u3pb8b72ll14164t4dfae1vl6c9...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>,
> >>>>>> nid...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>>>>> says...
> >>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 04:05:46 -0700 (PDT), Quadibloc
> >>>>>>> <jsav...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2008 01:32:06 -0700 (PDT), "fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"
> >>>>>>>> <fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote, in part:
>
> >>>>>>>>> There's an American senator named Charlie Keel. He believes
> >>>>>>>>> that China occupied the country of Tibet in 1951. Many
> >>>>>>>>> Americans believe in this claim
> >>>>>>>>> as well, mainly because their geographical knowledge is too
> >>>>>>>>> poor. Recently,
> >>>>>>>>> the American media starts to spread this false claim again,
and
> >>>>>>>>> they said
> >>>>>>>>> such things like even though Japan changed history in its
> >>>>>>>>> textbooks, China
> >>>>>>>>> also concealed the occupation of Tibet. This post will clarify
> >>>>>>>>> many things
> >>>>>>>>> and review some history with you. In 1951, China occupied
> >>>>>>>>> Tibet, this is a
> >>>>>>>>> fact. The reason is that as the Chinese Civil War ended,
> >>>>>>>>> Chinese troops from
> >>>>>>>>> 1948-1951 not only occupied Tibet, it also occupied
> >>>>>>>>> Heilongjiang, it also
> >>>>>>>>> occupied Hainan Island, it also occupied all provinces of
> >>>>>>>>> China. So
> >>>>>>>>> occupation of Tibet is natural, because Tibet has of course
> >>>>>>>>> always been a
> >>>>>>>>> part of China.
> >>>>>>>> Taiwan has always been part of China, too. The Communist rebels
> >>>>>>>> did not always
> >>>>>>>> control China, though. They were evil bullies. We know this
> >>>>>>>> because of how
> >>>>>>>> Mao, to keep his control of power, abandoned the successful
> >>>>>>>> measures of other
> >>>>>>>> people in feeding China, and instituted the Great Leap Forwards
> >>>>>>>> which caused
> >>>>>>>> mass starvation; we know this because of the Cultural
Revolution.
>
> >>>>>>>> Tibetans did not endure such abuses of their religion
> >>>>>>> There has never been any religion in Tibet. There was only an
> >>>>>>> evil cult in Tibet
> >>>>>>> which stole and tempered the teaching of Buddha to put it into
> >>>>>>> its own use for
> >>>>>>> the purpose of ruling over the Tibetan people both politically
> >>>>>>> and religiously.
> >>>>>>> This cult is in blatant contradiction with the teaching of
Buddha
> >>>>>>> which
> >>>>>>> advocates helping all sentient beings instead of ruling over
them
> >>>>>>> with slavery.
>
> >>>>>>> You and the entire western world have been fooled by Da-Lie
Lama.
> >>>>>> I see the agents of state security are busy
> >>>>> When the people of Tibet figure out that a very few men armed with
> >>>>> a little knowledge
> >>>>> about IEDs were able to stonewall the entire US forces (costing
> >>>>> them hundreds of
> >>>>> billions) in Iraq and the UN in Afghanistan, they will have it
even
> >>>>> better then the
> >>>>> Taliban because the population would be behind them 100%
> >>>> Not in a million years. Keep dreaming. A handful Lamas who rely on
> >>>> government salary to stay alive will never be able to fulfill your
> >>>> fantasy. How sad for you. Your vicious evil intent will never be
> >>>> fulfilled.
> >>> Yea and a handful of Pakistanis couldn't drive NATO nuts either.  
(O:
>
> >> There is no similarity to compare. It's only your wild imagination.
>
> >>> Who do you write propaganda for????   The Chinese embassy?
>
> >> I write for myself who is a Chinese. Am I being Chinese making you
> >> upset?
>
> > You would be singing a more rational tune if you were Tibetan.
>
> > I can see that you don't want me to even give these poor suppressed
people
> > even a glimmer of hope by suggesting how other oppressed peoples are
> > dealing
> > with greedy bullies.
>
> Moses knew how to deal with people who wanted to keep his people
enslaved.

too bad Dalai isn't moses, he just a lying balding fat ass
 




 1 Posts in Topic:
Re: On the issue of Tibet...
freedomfighterzen@[EMAIL   2008-03-26 22:56:29 

Post A Reply:
  Go here to Signup

AddThis Feed Button


About - Advertising - Contact - Frequently Asked Questions - Privacy Policy - Terms of Use - Signup

Contact
tan12V112 Mon Oct 6 18:04:16 CDT 2008.