On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 23:16:26 -0700, fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On 3月27日, 上午8时41分, netvegetable <flav...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:05:30 -0700, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>> >> Tibetans would be satisfied with more autonomy and self control. If
>> >> they want their own state, why should China resist that?
>>
>> >> If that is what Tibetans want, what is China afraid of?
>>
>> > Define 'Tibetans' and then the 'people of Tibet'. Do Tibetans or the
>> > people of Tibet own
>> > Tibet? What is the central government afraid of is not the issue...
>> > but perhaps the issue
>> > from your sentimental point of view.
>>
>> > The people in the streets also want to get a few dimes for coffee
>> > from the Royal Bank of Canada too. What is the Bank of Canada afraid
>> > of? Well, if that is what they 'want'.
>>
>> That would involve the "Royal Bank of Canada". What do you lose if
>> Tibet has self=determination?
>
> Then what do you lose when Tibet is not allowed 'self-determination'?
Answer my question, I'll answer yours. Or are you afraid to?
--
A: Top posters
Q: What's the most annoying thing on usenet
"Conservatives are not necessarily stupid, but most stupid people are
conservatives." - John Stuart Mill
|
