On Mar 29, 11:28=A0pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2008 23:05:10 +0800, rst0wxyz wrote
> (in article
> <78b7d30f-c2f6-4e48-a674-2905df36e...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
> > The Americans have succeeded in humiliating the Iraqis.
>
> 1. The US government (not Americans in general) has done terrible
things, =
and
> not just in Iraq.
The US government has done terrible things.
The US troops have done even worse things on their own initiative.
>
> 2. That fact is irrelevant to this discussion.
Yeah, any word that reflected badly on America and Americans is
irrelevant. You're getting to be like LT Lee, which is irrelevant and
illogical.
>
> > The CIA/American government have tried unsuccessfully in trying to
humil=
iate
> > the Chinese government time and time since the 1950s. =A0So don't say
no=
> > one would want to humiliate 1.3 billion human beings. =A0They are
still
> > trying to humiliate the Chinese government in Tibet today.
>
> Some Chinese have a humiliation paranoia (supposedly arising from when
Chi=
na
> was called "the sick man of Asia".
Not since Mao Zedong declared: "China had stood up".
>
> Criticizing the CCP for preventing the Chinese from having normal human
> rights does not "humiliate" the Chinese.
Before criticizing the CCP, first clean up your own house of that
rotten stench coming from the White House, and Capital Hill. You
people don't even consider Iraqis human beings with your bombs and
missiles, killing indiscriminately.
>
> >> But what if the 1.3 billiion Chinese are seen as less than human?
>
> > Let's say "coolies of the world".
>
> Anyone who says that is wrong-headed.
And you are twice wrong headed with your twisted minds in regard to
the CCP. I think the CCP has done a wonderful job in China with
regard to the people's livelihood and getting China into the future
with much hope and promises.
>
> >> Need to be told what "freedom" is;
>
> > Certainly, Con****ianism required obedience. =A0Freedom is the opposite
> > of obedience.
>
> False and true.
You don't even know what that means.
> > Blame it all on Con****ianism.
>
> Nay. Con****ianism is not the problem.
Con****ianism tie China to the past. As long as Con****ianism exist in
China, China remains backward.
> Military power in the hands of the CCP is the problem.
China needs more military power in the hands of the CCP. So far the
CCP has proven to be China's salvation. Without the CCP, China would
still be in the bottom of the pit.
>
> > There are still people like LT Lee, PaPaPeng, Wacky Wrong,... who
> > still think like Emperor QianLong, that Con****ianism is the greatest,
> > and China has everything under heaven.
>
> None of my business. Not relevant.
Oh!! yeah, Jim Walsh is getting too old and irrelevant and illogical.
|
