On Mar 31, 11:22=A0am, CharlesLiu <chliu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Mar 31, 11:18=A0am, bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Mar 30, 5:36=A0pm, zai-zai <zai...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > > bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> > > > On Mar 30, 7:43 am, Yu <yuga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > > >> Re****ters Without Border made headlines again and again recently
by=
> > > >> disrupting the Beijing Olymic Games. This is another so called
ngo
> > > >> funded by the US National Endowment For democracy linked to the
CIA=
.
>
> > > >> Re****ters Without Borders -
Unmaskedhttp://havanajournal.com/politi=
cs/entry/re****ters_without_borders_unm...
>
> > > >> The Lies of Re****ters without Borders
> > > >> by Salim Lamrani*http://www.voltairenet.org/article127688.html
>
> > > >> UNESCO withdraw patronage to Re****ters Without
Borderhttp://xkorpio=
n.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/unesco-withdraw-patronage-to...
> > > >> Paris, March 12 ABN.- The United Nations Educational, Scientific
an=
d
> > > >> Cultural Organization (UNESCO) withdrew this Wednesday the
patronag=
e
> > > >> to the group Re****ters Without Borders (RSF, for French) on the
> > > >> occasion of the International day for freedom of expression on
the
> > > >> internet, because they consider that this group keeps a
"reiterated=
> > > >> lack of ethics on their purposes of discrediting a certain number
o=
f
> > > >> countries."
> > > >> According to diplomatic sources from the United Nations
Organizatio=
n,
> > > >> the performance of Re****ters Without Borders does not fit to the
> > > >> profile nor the purposes of the UNESCO, and shows one more time
its=
> > > >> gutter press interest due to the fact of acting like inquisitive
co=
urt
> > > >> of developing nations, re****ted Prensa Latina.
> > > >> Likewise, some media re****ted that for this reason and other
record=
s,
> > > >> the UN definitely finishes the relation it has with RSF and
exclude=
s
> > > >> any kind of collaboration in the future.
> > > >> In order to show the denominated Nations with cyber-censor****p,
the=
> > > >> French association, charged several times due to its tie bonds to
t=
he
> > > >> US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), launched this Wednesday its
> > > >> campaign.
> > > >> Oddly, on the RSF blacklist do not appear any of the Western
countr=
ies
> > > >> and the fire is focused on the so called Third World, recalled
the
> > > >> diplomats who talked to Prensa Latina.
> > > >> Canadian journalist Jean-Guy Allard denounced in several articles
a=
nd
> > > >> in a book the fact that Re****ters Without Borders is partly
finance=
d
> > > >> by the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
> > > >> Besides, Allard expressed the RSF links to self-confessed agents
fr=
om
> > > >> the CIA and the financial sup****t that it also receives from the
> > > >> European Union. In 2005, the latter handed over more than a
million=
> > > >> euros to RSF.
> > > >> Faced to the withdrawal of the patronage on behalf of the UNESCO
fo=
r
> > > >> the celebration of this day, Re****ters Without Borders, through a
> > > >> communique spread this Tuesday in the night, said that "the
UNESCO =
has
> > > >> withdrawn its sup****t to the promotion of this campaign because
> > > >> several of the Nations which are part of the list of Internet
Enemi=
es
> > > >> published by the nongovernmental organization have directly put
> > > >> pressure to achieve it."
>
> > > > I have no comment about RSB, but Yu's sources are, as usual,
extreme=
ly
> > > > biased and questionable.
>
> > > UNESCO biased ! NED biased ! CIA biased ! LOL !
>
> > You can't even recognize bias. You are just another stooge spewing
> > meaningless bile. You have no interest in getting at the truth because
> > you can't handle the truth.
>
> Here are the FACTS, so much for your truth.
>
> There are plenty of sources on this fact.
Maybe so, but that wasn't the point. I initially said "I have no
comment about RSB, but Yu's sources [such as "havanajournal"] are, as
usual, extremely biased and questionable."
I stand by that, and honest Charles' inability to follow a discussion
doesn't change anything. Sometimes it's hard to tell if Charles is
being dishonest or is just clueless.
But hey, I hear that if you say stuff like FACTS using capital letters
it becomes more true.
<snicker>
|
