On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:12:44 -0700, xi wrote:
> when freedom gets taken away from people who don't harm anyone, then
that
> is imho a good reason to stop the oppressor. even with violence, if
> everything else doesn't help.
> -------------------------
> No, then you become the oppressor. Have you westerners not learnt that
> yet??? You have "saved" enough countries and have killed millions in
name
i personally learned, that sometimes violence is the answer. it stopped
ww2. and freed my country from a totalitarian regime.
there is no evidence, that hitler could have been removed without
destroying the german army.
i don't think that war is the answer for tibet though.
> of democracy or freedom or human rights or whatever your cor****ations
> wanted you to die for. That is enough. No more crimes in the name of
> freedom, stop. More compassion and less politics. More peace and respect
> and less people who force others in the name of their own freedom.
so if the uk takes honkkong back against the will of the citizens, you
won't use violence? no more crimes in the name of freedom, stop?
|
