On Mar 31, 2:42=A0pm, ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:11:24 -0700 (PDT), bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >On Mar 31, 11:59?am, CharlesLiu <chliu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Mar 31, 11:39?am, bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> >> > On Mar 31, 11:22?am, CharlesLiu <chliu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > > On Mar 31, 11:18?am, bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> >> > > > On Mar 30, 5:36?pm, zai-zai <zai...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> > > > > > On Mar 30, 7:43 am, Yu <yuga...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> > > > > >> Re****ters Without Border made headlines again and again
rece=
ntly by
> >> > > > > >> disrupting the Beijing Olymic Games. This is another so
call=
ed ngo
> >> > > > > >> funded by the US National Endowment For democracy linked
to =
the CIA .
>
> >> > > > > >> Re****ters Without Borders -
Unmaskedhttp://havanajournal.com=
/politics/entry/re****ters_without_borders_unm...
>
> >> > > > > >> The Lies of Re****ters without Borders
> >> > > > > >> by Salim
Lamrani*http://www.voltairenet.org/article127688.ht=
ml
>
> >> > > > > >> UNESCO withdraw patronage to Re****ters Without
Borderhttp://=
xkorpion.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/unesco-withdraw-patronage-to...
> >> > > > > >> Paris, March 12 ABN.- The United Nations Educational,
Scient=
ific and
> >> > > > > >> Cultural Organization (UNESCO) withdrew this Wednesday the
p=
atronage
> >> > > > > >> to the group Re****ters Without Borders (RSF, for French)
on =
the
> >> > > > > >> occasion of the International day for freedom of
expression =
on the
> >> > > > > >> internet, because they consider that this group keeps a
"rei=
terated
> >> > > > > >> lack of ethics on their purposes of discrediting a certain
n=
umber of
> >> > > > > >> countries."
> >> > > > > >> According to diplomatic sources from the United Nations
Orga=
nization,
> >> > > > > >> the performance of Re****ters Without Borders does not fit
to=
the
> >> > > > > >> profile nor the purposes of the UNESCO, and shows one more
t=
ime its
> >> > > > > >> gutter press interest due to the fact of acting like
inquisi=
tive court
> >> > > > > >> of developing nations, re****ted Prensa Latina.
> >> > > > > >> Likewise, some media re****ted that for this reason and
other=
records,
> >> > > > > >> the UN definitely finishes the relation it has with RSF
and =
excludes
> >> > > > > >> any kind of collaboration in the future.
> >> > > > > >> In order to show the denominated Nations with
cyber-censorsh=
ip, the
> >> > > > > >> French association, charged several times due to its tie
bon=
ds to the
> >> > > > > >> US Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), launched this
Wednesda=
y its
> >> > > > > >> campaign.
> >> > > > > >> Oddly, on the RSF blacklist do not appear any of the
Western=
countries
> >> > > > > >> and the fire is focused on the so called Third World,
recall=
ed the
> >> > > > > >> diplomats who talked to Prensa Latina.
> >> > > > > >> Canadian journalist Jean-Guy Allard denounced in several
art=
icles and
> >> > > > > >> in a book the fact that Re****ters Without Borders is
partly =
financed
> >> > > > > >> by the US National Endowment for Democracy (NED).
> >> > > > > >> Besides, Allard expressed the RSF links to self-confessed
ag=
ents from
> >> > > > > >> the CIA and the financial sup****t that it also receives
from=
the
> >> > > > > >> European Union. In 2005, the latter handed over more than
a =
million
> >> > > > > >> euros to RSF.
> >> > > > > >> Faced to the withdrawal of the patronage on behalf of the
UN=
ESCO for
> >> > > > > >> the celebration of this day, Re****ters Without Borders,
thro=
ugh a
> >> > > > > >> communique spread this Tuesday in the night, said that
"the =
UNESCO has
> >> > > > > >> withdrawn its sup****t to the promotion of this campaign
beca=
use
> >> > > > > >> several of the Nations which are part of the list of
Interne=
t Enemies
> >> > > > > >> published by the nongovernmental organization have
directly =
put
> >> > > > > >> pressure to achieve it."
>
> >> > > > > > I have no comment about RSB, but Yu's sources are, as
usual, =
extremely
> >> > > > > > biased and questionable.
>
> >> > > > > UNESCO biased ! NED biased ! CIA biased ! LOL !
>
> >> > > > You can't even recognize bias. You are just another stooge
spewin=
g
> >> > > > meaningless bile. You have no interest in getting at the truth
be=
cause
> >> > > > you can't handle the truth.
>
> >> > > Here are the FACTS, so much for your truth.
>
> >> > > There are plenty of sources on this fact.
>
> >> > Maybe so, but that wasn't the point. I initially said "I have no
> >> > comment about RSB, but Yu's sources [such as "havanajournal"] are,
as=
> >> > usual, extremely biased and questionable."
>
> >> Yu's source is vetted by these other sources:
>
> >In this case, maybe. You don't seem to quite get the point about what
> >calling something a biased source means...
>
> I'm sure I don't, so what does it mean? I'm all ears.
Your ears don't work.
|
