On Mar 31, 4:06=A0pm, baldeagle <botakea...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Apr 1, 2:22=A0am, CharlesLiu <chliu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > On Mar 31, 11:18=A0am, bmo...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
> > > > UNESCO biased ! NED biased ! CIA biased ! LOL !
>
> > > You can't even recognize bias. You are just another stooge spewing
> > > meaningless bile. You have no interest in getting at the truth
because=
> > > you can't handle the truth.
>
> > Here are the FACTS, so much for your truth.
>
> Hey Lu..
>
> bmo is UNABLE to defense the bias NED.or CIA.
I have never defended deceptive practices, be they those of the CIA or
the CCP. So your STATEMENT (snicker) is meaningless.
> So
> he launches personal attacks on people who criticised
> these bias US organisation...as a diversion.. This is his
> usual tactics. =A0This is his modus operandi.
Um, not quite. When my rational arguments are met with idiocy like
yours, I get frustrated and call people names, which are richly
deserved in your case. Charles at least sometimes tries to be
unbiased. You are a lose-lose in almost every case.
> He said that you cannot reconigse bais
No, I didn't say that about Charles. I said it about someone else.
Which proves once again that you can't follow a conversation. You are
simply too stupid to converse with. You are an intellectual midget. So
I will entertain myself with the admittedly self-indulgent pleasure of
taunting you.
> ...what you said
> is meaningless.
> Any proof showing NED and CIA are bais.. will simply
> be treated by him as not proof that what you said is meaningless.
>
> It is you and your words, not NED or CIA's words =A0...
> become the topic of discussion.
>
> The way to deal with such low down character is to
> launch similar personal attacks on him...mock him,..
> treat his attacks as jokes,...or to ignore him.
I'm getting to you, obviously. Maybe I should leave you alone. Your
mind is too little.
|
