On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 01:58:07 -0500, Jim Walsh
<jSPAMimNwalshO3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:58:28 -0700, Bryson wrote:
>
>> "Jim Walsh" <jSPAMimNwalshO3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote in message news:
>> 1206972121_1253@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 06:28:00 -0700, Bryson wrote:
>
>>>> You imply that Taiwan is part of China
>>>
>>> It is the Republic of China. I make no implication. I use the official
>>> name.
>>>
>>>
>> Very interesting. Some Chinese in Taiwan refer to themselves as
>> Taiwanese and want independence from the Mainland, but you refer to
>> Taiwan as China.
>
>True.
>
>> Is your goal after destroying the Mainland Chinese
>> government to establish this ROC in Mainland China? Or are you against
>> the Chinese in Taiwan declaring independence from Mainland Communist
>> China?
>
>I am indifferent to what the people of the ROC do with their freedom.
>Independence or unification, it is their business, not mine.
Weasel words Jim. Weasel words. There is no misunderstanding your
words. You are so predictable. For >20 years you had insisted that
you love (as in Love Jim) the Taiwanese and will defend their fight
for freedom from the pinko commie mainlanders. And you spent an
enormous amount of time and effort posting in this newsgroup on that
theme, less so for Taiwan freedom than for your own freedom to be a
gadfly on anything Chinese. This time round the March Taiwan
elections proved you on the wrong side of history. Don't you think
you have lost your basis for continuing your "love" line. Surely your
law degree courses have taught you the art of argument based on
evidence not on your prejudices.
|
