On 3=D4=C231=C8=D5, =CF=C2=CE=E76=CA=B105=B7=D6, ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:13:54 -0700 (PDT), CharlesLiu
>
>
>
>
>
> <chliu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Mar 30, 6:49?am, ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:09:38 -0700 (PDT), bitter anko
>
> >> <kaz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >The incontrovertible evidence unveiling the fact that "the Riots in
> >> >Tibet" is nothing more than the fabrication "Rape of Nanking".
>
> >> >Beijing orchestrating Tibet riots
> >>
>http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/chinese-orchestrating-riots-tibet.ht=
m
>
> >> >Chinese People's Liberation Army is preparing Tibet monk clothes,
and
> >> >waiting to star as the "violent Tibet monks".
> >> >They plot as crude as the fabrication "Rape of Nanking", which was
> >> >jointly played together with the USA.
>
> >> >Bwahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaa!
>
> >> Shame on you, you lying sack of ****. That picture is five years old
> >> which is likely taken from a movie set.
>
> >Can you name the movie? How about some source to prove it. I think the
> >way to deal with this is get the facts out in the open.
>
> >Again, here's the photo we're talking about, right?
>
>
>http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/images/Chinese-soldiers-posing-riot...
>
> >I would like to see this debunked, if it is in fact fabricated.
>
> That couldn't be easier. All you need is to read the fine print
> underneath the photo. It shows the photo was taken in 2003.
>
> Here I quote: "This is not an uncommon 'tactical move' from the
> Chinese government as could be seen on the back-cover of the 2003
> annual TCHRD Re****t".
>
> Was there any social unrest in Tibet in 2003? No, I don't think so.
>
>
>
>
>
> >> Here is a picture of real lamas for you.
>
> >>http://img.ifeng.com/res/200803/0329_352643.jpg-
=D2=FE=B2=D8=B1=BB=D2=
=FD=D3=C3=CE=C4=D7=D6 -
>
> - =CF=D4=CA=BE=D2=FD=D3=C3=B5=C4=CE=C4=D7=D6 --
=D2=FE=B2=D8=B1=BB=D2=FD=
=D3=C3=CE=C4=D7=D6 -
>
> - =CF=D4=CA=BE=D2=FD=D3=C3=B5=C4=CE=C4=D7=D6 -
The uniform in the photo had been canceled in 2005, the armed
policemen had been not uniformed like that for 3 years. That is to
say, the photo must be taken before 2005. In china, the armed
policemen are usually appionted to be actors for official movies, so i
guess the soliders was preparing for movie, not for battle.
|
