Osama Bush Ladin wrote:
> In article <6f68c247-3d43-41b9-94bb-
> 7ad4b50f8651@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, fyfpoon@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>>
>>
>> On Mar 31, 2:21 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:53:21 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
>>> (in article
>>> <93769840-77f7-4eb6-92c7-0322c8442...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 3月31日, 下午1时48分, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:47:15 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
>>>>> (in article
>>>>>
<0fc85860-3b62-4e57-8553-b01a9aa53...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>>>
>>>>>> On Mar 30, 8:42 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:45:17 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
>>>>>>> (in article
>>>>>>>
<2694175c-7991-41e1-b1ca-ce93dd592...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>>>>>>>> Then who pays for the overheads incurred in that monumental
>>>>>>>> structure? YOu are not talking about freedom in vacuum. What
>>>>>>>> freedom? Freedom to starve to death? Who feeds the monks?
>>>
>>>>>>> None of my business who feeds the monks. None of yours either.
>>>>>>> Freedom of
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> religion does not imply or suggest taxpayers paying for
>>>>>>> churches, shrines,
>>>>>>> etc.
>>>
>>>>>>> Let Tibetan be free (let all Chinese be free (let all people be
>>>>>>> free)) and
>>>>>>> they will decide (individually and collectively) to build or
>>>>>>> not to build,
>>>>>>> to feed or not to feed.
>>>>>> Jim, this is the first time you withdraw from debating using
>>>>>> slogans or rallying cry, due to the fact that you did not study
>>>>>> economics well while in college.
>>>
>>>>> Sorry, Mr. Fyfpoon, I don't understand the above.
>>>
>>>>> 1. I don't understand why you said I withdrew from debating.
>>>
>>>>> 2. I didn't major in economics. My undergraduate major was
>>>>> history, but I studied some economics. My graduate degree is in
>>>>> law. A law school education
>>>>> involves some study of economics, too.
>>>> You seem to be ignoring the concept of scarcity which is essential
>>>> to any form of economics learning.
>>>
>>> I still don't see what you are getting at here. Sorry.
>>>
>>>> I don't doubt that CCP is a dictator but the other side is not
>>>> necessarily
>>>
>>> that democratic.
>>>
>>> I don't sup****t any side or party in Tibet or in China. The
>>> officials in both cases should elected by the people.
>>
>> How is that going to be brought about?
>
> How about free and open elections?
Haven't you heard?! It will be chaos, destruction,....DOOOOOOOOM! The
CIA
will win the election! Men will start wearing dresses! Cats and dogs
living together!!!!! And how do we know this? Cause the CCP and their
SCC
buttboys tell us so.
|
