On Apr 1, 11:23=A0am, "OD" <Ya...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> Osama Bush Ladin wrote:
> > In article <6f68c247-3d43-41b9-94bb-
> > 7ad4b50f8...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
says...
>
> >> On Mar 31, 2:21 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 13:53:21 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
> >>> (in article
> >>>
<93769840-77f7-4eb6-92c7-0322c8442...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
>
> >>>> On 3=D4=C231=C8=D5, =CF=C2=CE=E71=CA=B148=B7=D6, Jim Walsh
<jimNOwals=
SPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 23:47:15 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
> >>>>> (in article
> >>>>>
<0fc85860-3b62-4e57-8553-b01a9aa53...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>)=
:
>
> >>>>>> On Mar 30, 8:42 pm, Jim Walsh <jimNOwalsSPA...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 14:45:17 +0800, fyfp...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
> >>>>>>> (in article
> >>>>>>>
<2694175c-7991-41e1-b1ca-ce93dd592...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>):
> >>>>>>>> Then who pays for the overheads incurred in that monumental
> >>>>>>>> structure? YOu are not talking about freedom in vacuum. What
> >>>>>>>> freedom? Freedom to starve to death? Who feeds the monks?
>
> >>>>>>> None of my business who feeds the monks. None of yours either.
> >>>>>>> Freedom of
>
> >>>>>>> religion does not imply or suggest taxpayers paying for
> >>>>>>> churches, shrines,
> >>>>>>> etc.
>
> >>>>>>> Let Tibetan be free (let all Chinese be free (let all people be
> >>>>>>> free)) and
> >>>>>>> they will decide (individually and collectively) to build or
> >>>>>>> not to build,
> >>>>>>> to feed or not to feed.
> >>>>>> Jim, this is the first time you withdraw from debating using
> >>>>>> slogans or rallying cry, due to the fact that you did not study
> >>>>>> economics well while in college.
>
> >>>>> Sorry, Mr. Fyfpoon, I don't understand the above.
>
> >>>>> 1. I don't understand why you said I withdrew from debating.
>
> >>>>> 2. I didn't major in economics. My undergraduate major was
> >>>>> history, but I studied some economics. My graduate degree is in
> >>>>> law. A law school education
> >>>>> involves some study of economics, too.
> >>>> You seem to be ignoring the concept of scarcity which is essential
> >>>> to any form of economics learning.
>
> >>> I still don't see what you are getting at here. Sorry.
>
> >>>> I don't doubt that CCP is a dictator but the other side is not
> >>>> necessarily
>
> >>> that democratic.
>
> >>> I don't sup****t any side or party in Tibet or in China. The
> >>> officials in both cases should elected by the people.
>
> >> How is that going to be brought about?
>
> > How about free and open elections?
>
> Haven't you heard?!
Yes, I have heard.
>=A0It will be chaos, destruction,....DOOOOOOOOM! =A0The CIA
> will win the election!
Definitely. It's the CIA's job, covert operations to create chaos and
dissension in other nations.
>=A0Men will start wearing dresses!
Yes, they certainly do. It's called kilts.
> =A0Cats and dogs
> living together!!!!!
Many families have dogs and cats living together under the same house.
>=A0And how do we know this? =A0Cause the CCP and their SCC
> buttboys tell us so.
And of cause, you are too brain-washed by American propaganda to know
any better.
|
