On Mar 31, 3:05=A0am, ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 00:13:54 -0700 (PDT), CharlesLiu
>
>
>
>
>
> <chliu...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >On Mar 30, 6:49?am, ni...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >> On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 05:09:38 -0700 (PDT), bitter anko
>
> >> <kaz...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> >The incontrovertible evidence unveiling the fact that "the Riots in
> >> >Tibet" is nothing more than the fabrication "Rape of Nanking".
>
> >> >Beijing orchestrating Tibet riots
> >>
>http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/chinese-orchestrating-riots-tibet.ht=
m
>
> >> >Chinese People's Liberation Army is preparing Tibet monk clothes,
and
> >> >waiting to star as the "violent Tibet monks".
> >> >They plot as crude as the fabrication "Rape of Nanking", which was
> >> >jointly played together with the USA.
>
> >> >Bwahahahahahahahahahahaaaaaaaa!
>
> >> Shame on you, you lying sack of ****. That picture is five years old
> >> which is likely taken from amovieset.
>
> >Can you name themovie? How about some source to prove it. I think the
> >way to deal with this is get the facts out in the open.
>
> >Again, here's the photo we're talking about, right?
>
>
>http://buddhism.kalachakranet.org/images/Chinese-soldiers-posing-riot...
>
> >I would like to see this debunked, if it is in fact fabricated.
>
> That couldn't be easier. All you need is to read the fine print
> underneath the photo. It shows the photo was taken in 2003.
>
> Here I quote: "This is not an uncommon 'tactical move' from the
> Chinese government as could be seen on the back-cover of the 2003
> annual TCHRD Re****t".
Here's the movie "Red River Valley" shot in Tibet:
http://www.loogoo.com/commodity/1886.html
So does HH know the back cover of the 2003 annual re****t was a lie?
http://www.fyjs.cn/bbs/read.php?tid=3D134285&fpage=3D0&toread=3D&page=3D5
Also the source of Epoch Times re****t is a UK tabloid blog "G2
Bulletin". G2 Bulletin also re****ted Princess Diana was under NSA
watch when she was murdered.
>
> Was there any social unrest in Tibet in 2003? No, I don't think so.
>
>
>
>
>
> >> Here is a picture of real lamas for you.
>
> >>http://img.ifeng.com/res/200803/0329_352643.jpg-
Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


|