On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 02:09:43 -0500, Jim Walsh
<jSPAMimNwalshO3@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:28:04 -0700, xi wrote:
>
>> I am one, you? you are zero.
>>
>> On Mar 31, 4:23?pm, diarrhetics <implantol...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>>> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 07:18:51 -0700, xi wrote:
>>> > Nobody gave you any right to speak in our name nor to save anyboby,
>>> > frustrated hero.
>>>
>>> and who gave you the right to speak for 1,3 billion chinese?
>
>Are you claiming that every Chinese person has the right to speak for 1.3
>billion Chinese? Well, then stop complaining about Micky Wong. You have
>acknowledged his the right to speak for all Chinese. Stop complaining
>about the Dalai Lama. You have acknowledged his right to speak for all
>Chinese.
>
>But of course that is wrong. I speak for me. You speak for you. Sadly,
>most of the 1.3 billion Chinese are afraid that they will be persecuted
>if they speak for themselves.
Stop dreaming. Everyone in China can speak for himself or herself on
their own, and you can be sure none of them will be interested in
speaking anything on your terms. I can assure you that your western
style democracy simply does not sell in China. It's culturally
incompatible.
|
