On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:36:55 -0700, Bryson wrote:
> On Apr 3, 2:01 am, Jim Walsh <jSPAMimNwals...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:16:09 -0700, Bryson wrote:
>> > On Apr 1, 2:05 am, Jim Walsh <jSPAMimNwals...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>> >> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 09:58:28 -0700, Bryson wrote:
>> >> > Nonsense, democracy is a system suited only for certain countries
>> >> > with people brought up throughout the centuries to think in a
>> >> > certain way. It does not work in countries where people are only
>> >> > interested in their personal survival.
>>
>> >> Your claim that the Chinese are animals who have no human feelings
>> >> or desires is disgusting. I doubt that you even think that.
>>
>> > Those are words you yourself have fabricated. Show me where exactly I
>> > wrote that "the Chinese are animals who have no human feelings or
>> > desires" which you accused me of having done.
>>
>> You said:
>>
>> 1. Democracy is not suited to the Chinese. 2. Democracy is not suited
>> to people who are only interested in their personal survival.
>>
>>
> Show me the link to the post which I specifically said the above.
Your post with the relevant words is quoted above.
>> I concluded that you were claiming that the Chinese are only interested
>> in their personal survival.
My conclusion is reasonably based on the following statement:
"[D]emocracy is a system suited only for certain countries with people
brought up throughout the centuries to think in a certain way. It does
not work in countries where people are only interested in their personal
survival."
>> People that are only interested in person survival lack human feelings
>> and desires.
>>
>> If you realize that the Chinese people are interested in a lot more
>> than their personal survival, then you must realize that your argument
>> against democracy in China eva****ates.
>>
>>
> I am not arguing against democracy.
Of course you are.
> I am arguing that we Westerners must
> not ram our political system down the throats of any other people,
> including the Chinese.
Posting on SCC is not "ramming" anything anywhere.
> The Chinese people know what they want, and they
> will get it, without interference.....
Posting on SCC is not interference.
BTW, challenging the ***ual orientation of people who post on SCC, where
***ual orientation is not remotely relevant, suggest you have ***ual
orientation issues.
--
Love, Jim
(P.S. I routinely delete excessive newsgroups when I follow-up.)
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com
The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+
Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption
=----
|
