On Apr 9, 8:40=A0pm, PaPaPeng <PaPaP...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 18:14:48 -0700 (PDT), demoris...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> >On Apr 9, 5:01=A0pm, PaPaPeng <PaPaP...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 9 Apr 2008 07:09:02 -0700 (PDT), xi <xieu.l...@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> ><its likely a rich Asian will be more than happy to pick up the
> >> >slack.><China, India, Japan?,
> >> >Malaysia, Singa****e>
>
> >> >I am not so sure. To associate a brand to the Olympic brand is a
> >> >billionaire decission that ust be done 4 years in advance. Who knows
> >> >what can happen in 4 years.
>
> >> It is tied to my prediction that few if any G7 countries will want to
> >> have that expensive an Olympics security headache. =A0So an Asian
> >> country bids for it, or perhaps a much reduced Olympics may induce a
> >> G7 country to host it after all. =A0Canada looks like the best
> >> possibility. =A0But with the 2010 Winter Olympics under its belt its
> >> very chancy. =A0The main point is the size and cost of hosting future
> >> Olympics after London will be a lot more modest. =A0That won't
attract
> >> the current US and G7 gflobal brands. =A0The lower cost may attract
the=
> >> up and coming Asian cor****ations. =A0Its an advertisers market for
> >> consumer products. =A0So it won't be SINOPEC types but an excellent
one=
> >> for Tata or Chinese cars, computers, white goods (not food products -
> >> that will invite sneers of toxic foods). =A0Yep. =A0The Beijing
Olympic=
s
> >> will be the last extravaganza for a long time to come.
>
> >Summary of PaPaPeng: Holding the Olympics in Beijing will have the
> >effect of ruining the Olympics "for a long time to come."
>
> Explain? =A0I don't get your point.
Your last sentence in that post stated:
Yep. The Beijing Olympics will be the last extravaganza for a long
time to come.
basically translate to what demorising said above.
|
